Documenting the West’s descent into Satanic receivership.
Pete Buttigieg’s black baby ‘discount’
In liberal celebrity circles, black babies sell like hotcakes.
Pete Buttigieg got his own BIPOC accessory for a “discount,” he explains, in the service of making the point that evil white racists don’t adopt black babies at the same rate that they do white babies:
We said that we wanted to adopt without regard for race*. By the way, anyone who says race is not a thing in this country should experience an adoption process where there are literally different lists if you say that you want a white kid only versus if you say that doesn’t matter, like literally a different list…
The list for a white kid only is longer. And, not only that, there was actually a discount – er, you didn’t have to pay a deposit — on the [black baby].
Pete Buttigieg says there’s a “discount” for adopting Black kids (Around 1:15)
— John Hasson (@SonofHas) April 23, 2025
He catches himself and then says he means there’s no deposit, but…YIKESpic.twitter.com/OBGEMaiGvN
*Don’t let Pete Buttigieg lie to you: he almost definitely went out of his way to order a black baby. There was no “surprise adoption scenario,” as he put it; these people wear adopted minority on their children like fashion accessories, and Pete and his husband wanted one of their own to parade for the cameras.
Related: Video: Freshman Trans Rep. BRUTALLY Misgendered on House Floor
Devastating child-grooming chart exposes the dark reality of trans contagion
A couple of years ago in Mexico, my wife and I met an American couple. One of them, the woman, happened to be from Georgia as well, and we actually had at least one mutual friend.
She asked me what I did for work.
“I’m a journalist,” I told her, which I regretted immediately.
The regret was because I had (correctly, it turned out) diagnosed her very early in our socializing as a die-hard “progressive” after she mentioned she had relocated herself and her seemingly not equally enthusiastic husband to Mexico because of a vague reference to “things happening in the U.S.”
The “things happening” in the U.S., I rightfully assumed, meant “literal fascism.”
Her curiosity evidently piqued, she asked my last name so she could look me up.
I sighed internally, knowing more or less what would happen next.
I should have come up with a different story early on, but by then I was in too deep.
I gave her my full name.
The next time we met, she informed me that she “hated” my writing after discovering it via Google search.
Specifically, I learned, my “transphobia” around child transgenderism upset her most because “trust trans kids” or whatever.
Related: ‘Adult Baby’ Terrorizes Multiple Daycares With Feces
I didn’t really want to dive into this black hole of nonsense, because I knew there was no countering her zealotry; she wasn’t one of those on-the-fence types, with a vague appreciation for child transgenderism because some distant cousin had her kid transed and everything seemingly turned out alright but having never really fully fleshed out her feelings.
Rather, she was a hardcore child trannyist, and absolutely nothing I could have said would have swayed her.
But, understanding the futility, I defended myself anyway. The main line I took was that it was very weird that the rates of child trannyism had exploded by multiple thousands of percent in just a few short years starting around 2015.
Related: Shock Survey: Almost One-Third of Gen Z Now Gender-Queer
She predictably chalked it up to “increased acceptance of trans kids,” as these people always do to explain away the obvious effects of grooming, and that was basically the end of it.
I could have pulled this chart out at the time — which should shock the conscience and give pause to anyone who makes excuses for what the groomers have done to children — and it would have fallen on blind eyes.
Transgender identification by birth year USA pic.twitter.com/TpcuYvijUU
— Emil Kirkegaard (@KirkegaardEmil) April 20, 2025
People see what they want to see.
Bangkok government to subsidize cross-sex hormones for 200k transgenders
Let me assure you that the impoverished rice farmers of the Isaan region bordering Laos could definitely use a $5 million subsidy (the equivalent of 145 million baht) to literally survive.
But, instead, at the urging of the UN “Human Rights Council,” that precious, finite public money will be allocated to the provision of cross-sex hormones for the transgenders of Bangkok.
Via Bangkok Post:
In late January, the government approved the allocation of 145.63 million baht to the National Health Security Office to provide hormone medicine to 200,000 transgender people…
The policy was welcomed by Tlaleng Mofokeng, the United Nations Human Rights Council’s Special Rapporteur on the Right to Health, who visited Thailand in February.
“Previously, this was an out-of-pocket cost thereby preventing access,” she said.
“I urge the National Health Security Office to also be conscious of the multiple ways that transgender people experience violence within the health system and ensure the health system does not operate in a way that further violates or alienates transgender people out of care.”
Priorities.
