The United Nations has once again magically achieved consensus (whatever that means) without a vote and approved its “Pact for the Future,” which would destroy your future lives, hopes, and dreams like a globalist wrecking ball. Get ready for a world where cars, houses, and liberties are a privilege for the elite few.
There is no climate crisis and warming temperatures are actually beneficial to ecosystems. There is no reliable way to measure “average global temperature” either, and not a single major climate alarmist prediction has been accurate in more than 50 years. Yet the “Pact for the Future” is based on claims that “The Science” (may it live forever) demands radical sacrifices, restrictions, and changes in the lives of us peasants to save the planet.
Further recognize the need for deep, rapid and sustained reductions in greenhouse gas emissions in line with 1.5 degrees Celsius pathways and call on parties to contribute to the following global efforts, in a nationally determined manner, taking into account the Paris Agreement…tripling renewable energy capacity globally and doubling the global average annual rate of energy efficiency improvements by 2030; accelerating efforts towards the phase-down of unabated coal power; accelerating efforts globally toward net zero emission energy systems…well before or by around mid-century.
The first point to note is that the concept of an average global temperature is meaningless, a myth rather than a scientific reality. It is impossible to determine accurately, and we know recent measurements (at least from NOAA) are bogus, as 30%+ of temperature stations used to measure and report temperature data… don’t actually exist. NOAA just fabricates data.
Related: Climate Experts: ‘Global Warming’ Makes Ecosystems Thrive
Junk Science’s Steve Milloy provides an excellent explanation of why average global temperature measurements cannot be relied on, including the fact that such measurements have only been taken in many places for less than a hundred years, the fact that there are not temperature stations even now in many areas of the world, and the fact that satellite temperature measurements are unreliable.
Global temperature is totally meaningless.
— Steve Milloy (@JunkScience) August 10, 2024
Related links: https://t.co/hQxF5dMwli pic.twitter.com/mtwv8FmFBr
On the point of “renewable energy,” it is expensive, unreliable, inefficient, and toxic for the environment. Not only is the mining of requisite materials toxic, it depends on child labor in Africa and financially benefits the genocidal Chinese Communist Party. Manufacture and disposal of solar panels, wind turbines, and EV batteries are toxic too.
Furthermore, it is literally impossible to support society’s electrical grid as it is now using supposed renewable energy. For instance, in America, “green” energy would take up to half of US land. People in Europe and Texas died during winter blackouts partly caused by reliance on “renewable” energy. Furthermore, wind turbines and solar panels kill wildlife and permanently destroy land for other uses.
None of this, of course, influences the UN globalists’ plans for enforcing climate alarmist rules they have no intention of following in their own lives:
Transitioning away from fossil fuels in energy systems…so as to achieve net zero by 2050 in keeping with the science; accelerating zero- and low-emission technologies, including, inter alia, renewables, nuclear, abatement and removal technologies such as carbon capture and utilization and storage…accelerating the reduction of emissions from road transport on a range of pathways, including…deployment of zero- and low-emission vehicles; and phasing out inefficient fossil fuel subsidies.
In other words, if you cannot afford an expensive EV, which will not be reliable for long journeys anyway, say good-by to public transportation. Sure, the Marxist elites will continue to jet about in private planes, but unless you give up your minivan or SUV the planet will explode into unquenchable flames. Just trust the experts — or, as the UN says, “The Science” (may it live forever, awomen and amen).
“Net zero” carbon emissions is an impossible goal, nor should we want to achieve it. Carbon is an absolutely essential element to all living things, so reducing carbon would harm not only plants (including food crops) and animals, but also humans. This is literally a depopulation agenda.
Without even a vote, a few unelected bureaucrats have approved an agenda that many globalists, including American Democrats, intend to implement to yours and my detriment. We need to say no. We cannot let them force us to give up our rights, liberties, and comforts to appease their insatiable and Orwellian desire for control.
