Adventures in the Patriarchy™: Karens for Lindsay! Part VI

Premium
Advertisement
Adventures in the Patriarchy™:  Karens for Lindsay! Part VI
AP Photo/Josh Reynolds

Chronicling the ongoing intersectional struggle to liberate women — progressively defined to include the legacy kind and the transgender variety — from the Patriarchy™, one microaggression at a time.

Karen Lindsay apologist admits she would reconsider her support if Lindsay had screamed the ‘n-word’ while killing her children

Offering an extraordinary insight into the labyrinthine, perverted inner workings of the Karen’s mind — to the extent it runs on any kind of thought rather than pure emotion — a comedian jiu-jitsued a Lindsay apologist into admitting that, had Clancy uttered the naughty word at any point while she murdered her children, the Karen would be forced to reconsider her support.

RelatedWATCH: MSNBC Suggests Trump Plans to Deport African-Americans

Killing her own children = forgivable mental health episode

Saying the no-no word while murdering her own children = a bridge too far.

An instant classic.

TikTok performance art somehow getting more abstract, inscrutable

The period blood thing that we covered in a previous edition of Karens For Lindsay! was certainly weird.

Yet, feminists have been producing “art” with their menses for actually quite a long time now, which you might have noticed if you’ve been paying attention, so it’s not wholly surprising.

Then there’s the phenomenon of the feminist witches turning to the dark arts to lobby the spirit realm to deliver righteous justice to Lindsay (because God knows the American legal system isn’t going to).

(Of course, by “justice,” they mean pinning the blame on Lindsay’s husband based on absolutely no evidence.)

But again, feminist witches on TikTok casting spells to subvert the Patriarchy™ aren’t anything all that new either.

However, this Clancy Karen flopping around in her hot tub in a vaguely choreographed manner, making psychotic faces like Britney Spears after her mental health took a nosedive — now we’re breaking new ground.

Related: Liberal Banshees, Distraught Over Election Results, Convene to Scream at Lake Michigan

Juror admits she wanted to set precedent by acquitting Lindsay Clancy

A juror openly admitting, to empathetic nods from the diverse news actress, that her vote in a murder case was informed by, if not outright decided by, her desire to trigger political/social change has to be some kind of actionable admission of obstruction of justice that the Department of Justice should probably look into:

We knew that this was a turning point, and this would be something that could change something to make it better for other women in the future, for other families. You know, justice for those children is this never happening again.

RelatedThe RESTOR Act to Repeal the 19th Amendment

A functional legal system simply cannot survive this sort of behavior if it’s allowed to go not just unpunished but celebrated.

Comments

Recommended

Trending on PJ Media Videos