Chronicling the ongoing intersectional struggle to liberate women — progressively defined to include the legacy kind and the transgender variety — from the Patriarchy™, one microaggression at a time.
Autopsy photos were ‘too much’ for pro-Lindsay jurors who claim prosecution was trying to manipulate them with images of murdered children
The Lindsay Clancy Karens apparently don’t understand how prosecutions — or much of anything else, frankly — work.
Under the American system of justice, the job of the prosecutor is to show compelling evidence that indicates the guilt of the accused — in this case, Lindsay Clancy, accused of the brutal, premeditated, calculated murder of her three children one by one.
For any competent prosecutor, the cornerstone of that body of evidence would, of course, be the autopsy photos of the children that Lindsay Clancy strangled and other forensic evidence that people tend to leave behind when they murder their own children.
Related: Hillary Claims ‘Climate Change’ Killed 500,000 Last Year, ‘Particularly Pregnant Women’
But the trio of Karen jurors who voted to acquit — and appear to have been ready to acquit basically from day one — weren’t interested in the autopsy photos; they wanted to hear more from the defense about what an awesome mother Lindsay was (before she murdered her children) and, more generally, why women should never be accountable for any of their actions ever:
I thought it was too much. I thought the prosecution was just trying to get us to realize how horrific the whole thing was. Which, we knew the whole thing was horrific. But I think they wanted to keep piling on the morbid pictures and the morbid part of it all. Which was not even what we were trying to just prove.
The jury foreperson felt that “it was too much” from the prosecution regarding the autopsy reports/photos.
— Lindsay 🇺🇸 (@TheLinzerShow) September 10, 2026
“I thought the prosecution was just trying to get us to realize how horrific the whole crime was..”@SueOC_NBCBoston @NBC10Boston
Full extended interview:… pic.twitter.com/258YKQyLj0
Juror who refused to let Clancy off secretly a ‘MAGA grifter,’ claims TikTok lunatic
A TikTok lady who posts under the handle “Tylenol.autism,” which might tell you everything you need to know about her politics right off the bat, explains, employing the nonverbal “time-out” hands that annoying progressive women will often use to emphasize their point, that the lone male juror who refused to let Clancy get away with murder is “essentially a MAGA grifter”:
I have a theory that he is essentially a MAGA grifter and he is planning on selling his likeness and his story and all of that’s**t to podcasts and publications and he’s going to grift as much f***ing money out of this as he possibly can… I just don’t see what else it could possibly be.
TikTok harlot believes that juror who refuses to acquit Lindsay Clancy is a "MAGA grifter" pic.twitter.com/WRiuxwB3HS
— Thomas Paine Reloaded™ (@BenBartee) September 10, 2026
The MAGA boogeyman truly lives rent-free in these people’s heads.
Sad!
Related: #Resistance Liberals Tattoo Themselves Blue to Oppose Fascism, Spot ‘Safe People’
‘Justice for Lindsay Clancy’ tampon art
In the before-times, when The Patriarchy™ reigned supreme, menstruation was something that ladies of good breeding took care of discreetly.
That was then; this is now in the Brave New World.
Related: HuffPo Feminist Quits Shaving to Protest for Abortion Rights
Now, they make political statements with their period blood and/or some unknown red substance that looks like period blood and then upload the content to TikTok for applause from their comrades:
“We can transmute and alchemise this power into purpose!”
TikTok slags now producing tampon period art in support of Lindsay Clancy pic.twitter.com/WPAXavdXMR
— Thomas Paine Reloaded™ (@BenBartee) September 10, 2026
