Documenting the West’s descent into Satanic receivership at the hands of the gender goblins and their allies in media and government.
Abdul El-Sayed likens circumcision to child sex change surgery
Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed finds himself in quite a pickle.
On the one hand, you have to assume that, as an ostensibly devout Muslim, he’s personally not fully on board with the child trannification regime. More importantly for his career, though, maiming children’s genitals in the name of gender equity surely shocks the conscience of some huge percentage of the independents who might be convinced to vote for him and whom he needs to win.
So he can’t lend it his full-throated endorsement.
On the other hand, Abdul really needs the child trannyists’ votes come November — from Ann Arbor, from Lansing, from all of the university towns and trendy cosmopolitan areas. These people are his base.
And prohibiting them from mutilating their children’s sex organs, or even mildly criticizing the practice in public, is a non-starter.
Related: 'Trans Buddies' Assigned to Monitor Doctors for Transphobia
So he’s got to thread that needle.
Given the political context, Matt Margolis covered this trainwreck interview yesterday between Fox News’ Bill O’Reilly protégé Jesse Watters and Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed.
Abdul El- Sayed: Circumcision and child sex change surgery are basically the same thing pic.twitter.com/yIhQ7SBi0R
— Benjamin Bartee (@BenBartee) August 26, 2026
Related: ‘In My Daddy’s Belly’: LGBTQ+++™ Propaganda Book Teaches Children That Men Give Birth
You can’t really imagine a consultant feeding him this canned line, on account of how nonsensical, uncompelling, and, frankly, repulsive the average normie non-progressive Karen voter in Michigan would find it.
The line they probably gave him, which he ran with initially, was the common refrain that “healthcare choices are between the [child] patient, the parents, and the doctors” when it comes to making the decision to remove healthy breast tissue in order to align with the gender identity the child was introduced to by her perverted public school teacher — not really convincing to anyone with any sense of decency or morality, but a line that works on enough people enough of the time to allow politicians to get away with it in swing states where the progressive “chop all of their genitals off and let God sort them out” ethos doesn’t work like it does in Portland.
Another periodic reminder that politicians are venal worms
Recently departed UK Secretary of State for Health and Social Care James Murray, after years of reflection and public declarations to the contrary, has concluded that women don’t have penises after all.
He previously, for years, professed to believe that women have penises but has since changed his mind.
2022: "A woman can have a penis."
— Mike Fairclough (@1MikeFairclough) July 7, 2026
2026: "I've had a few years to think about it. A woman can't have a penis."
James Murray, the UK's Health Secretary. pic.twitter.com/Lika4qwjSu
Related: Video: Freshman Trans Rep. BRUTALLY Misgendered on House Floor
Beyond the schadenfreude of watching this decrepit, venal worm try to squirm his way out of the corner the reporter backed him into using his own words, this is a good periodic reminder that the vast majority of politicians, of any political stripe, have no convictions — moral or ideological or otherwise.
As a constituent interested in policy, you have to make them commit to the things you want them to commit to, because if you don’t, then someone else with more money or a louder voice will.
You have to make politicians like this weasel afraid, for instance, to say in public that women have penises because, if you don’t, the tranny bullies who run society and the medical and NGO industries and public health bureaucracies that prop them up will fill the void and make them say what they want them to say.
