Premium

Adventures in The Patriarchy™, Vol III: Voter ID vs. Feminism

AP Photo/Thibault Camus

(Contd. from Pt. IPt. II)

Chronicling the ongoing intersectional struggle to liberate women — inclusively defined as the legacy kind and the transgenders — from The Patriarchy™, one microaggression at a time. 

Ohio Democrats’ virtue-signaling bill to fine men who ejaculate outside of wedlock

Because they have no sense of humor, the left, the conventional wisdom holds, is not very good at meme-ing.

They’re also terrible trolls for the same reason.

But, bless their hearts, they try.

Here they are trying to make a statement about the alleged double standards for the sexes when it comes to “reproductive rights.”

Via Newsweek (emphasis added):

A bill proposed to the Ohio statehouse will make male ejaculation without intent to have a baby, a fineable offense of up to $10,000.

The bill has been proposed by State Representatives Anita Somani and Tristan Rader, who wrote it to point out what they see as the absurdity of rules that control women's bodies but do not control men's. It has not been formally introduced to the House Floor yet.

Per Somani and Rader, men would face a $1,000 first offense, $5,000 second offense, and $10,000 subsequent offense fine to "discharge semen or genetic material without intent to fertilize an embryo."

This is the second "Conception Begins at Erection" law to be brought up in Republican-led state house chambers after Mississippi state Senator Bradford Blackmon brought a similar bill to his State Senate in January.

Related: NPR Releases Hardcore Abortion Porn Audio to Savor on Your Morning Commute

Voter ID bill would force women back into the kitchen, out of voting booth, claims liberal media

It would also reportedly disenfranchise transgenders (another potential win) as well as racial minorities who Democrats claim — while professing to respect them — are too poor or stupid or lazy to get government ID despite literally needing one to do basic things like open a bank account or get legal employment.

Via Glamour (emphasis added):

The [voter ID] bill would impact millions of eligible voters, including the estimated 21.3 million Americans who do not have ready access to a birth certificate or passport, as well as anyone who relies on voting by mail. Early research indicates that it would disproportionately impact voters of color and young voters.

But it would also have a direct impact on anyone whose legal name does not match the name on their birth certificate or passport, such as the 79% of heterosexual married women, per Pew Research, who take their spouse’s last name

While out trans people represent a much smaller percentage of the country (about 1.6% of adults, according to Pew) than heterosexual married women, they, too, could face practically insurmountable hurdles to voting if this bill becomes law. Already, the State Department has blocked trans people from changing their gender markers on their passports.

Yum-yum for my tum-tum.

No need for the icing on the voter ID cake, libs; I was already going to dive in headfirst!

(I’m kidding; I respect and celebrate women’s voting rights in Our Sacred Democracy™. And, at any rate, the whole 19th Amendment ship has already sailed.)

RelatedPhysician: Libs Experiencing ‘9/11-Style’ Trauma After MAGA Takeover

The West forced to submit to ‘World Hijab Day’ in mass sadomasochism ritual

Here is a progressive member of Irish parliament during the COVID era, recently resurfaced on X, promoting something called “World Hijab Day” to a room full of masked fellow neoliberal slaves.  

It’s still going strong, apparently, marked this Year of Our Lord 2025 on February 2nd.

Related: VIDEO: Hillary Demands ‘Total Control’ of Social Media Via Censorship

NYPD — New York being a crime-free haven where the police don’t have any real police work to occupy their attention — even got in on the action for Equity™, Inclusion™, and Diversity™.

Meanwhile, in feminist utopia Afghanistan…

In Afghanistan, which is so progressive that it’s moved beyond the hijab to embrace the full-on head-to-toe burka, the deputy foreign minister has reportedly fled the country after suggesting that barring women from higher education is a moral wrong.

Via The Guardian (emphasis added):

A senior Taliban minister who expressed support for reversing the ban on girls’ education in Afghanistan appears to have been forced to flee the country.

Speaking at a graduation ceremony in Khost province, near the Afghan-Pakistani border, on 20 January, Mohammad Abbas Stanikzai, the Taliban’s deputy foreign minister, criticised the government’s ban on girls attending secondary schools and higher education.

“There is no excuse for this – not now and not in the future,” Stanikzai said. “We are being unjust to 20 million people.

“During the time of the prophet Muhammad, the doors of knowledge were open for both men and women,” he said. “There were such remarkable women that if I were to elaborate on their contributions, it would take a considerable amount of time.”…

After this speech, and reports of Stanikzai criticising him, the Taliban’s supreme leader, Hibatullah Akhundzada, allegedly ordered the minister’s arrest and issued a travel ban, which pushed Stanikzai to leave Afghanistan for the United Arab Emirates.

… After all of those USAID “humanitarian” billions in the name of liberalizing Afghanistan, this is the result.

Recommended

Trending on PJ Media Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement