Chronicling the ongoing intersectional struggle to liberate women — inclusively defined as the legacy kind and the transgenders — from The Patriarchy™, one microaggression at a time.
HuffPost feminist ‘ungenders’ Christmas, compelled to write a convoluted essay about it
Nothing — not even the birth of Christ, or maybe especially not the birth of Christ — is sacred enough to these people not to turn into some kind of intersectional psychodrama.
Related: Adventures in The Patriarchy™, Vol. I
Via HuffPost (emphasis added):
Over the past few years, I’ve seen a ton of content about how women take on the bulk of physical and emotional labor( that goes into making the holidays special…
This past year, I decided I’d had enough. I wanted to alleviate some of the pressure I put on myself, and so my goal was to (at least slightly) ungender the creation of holiday magic. I want to show my son that gender does not dictate who does the work of caregiving — not just on Christmas, but broadly as well…
Overall, ungendering the holidays can more evenly distribute responsibilities, but it also creates space for us to expand our awareness and ability to care for others. This work — the kind that makes memories — is all about perception, and changing that perception is crucial.
*Actual homemaking and caretaking is real labor, for which homemakers and mothers and wives probably deserve more acknowledgment and appreciation when they perform it. “Emotional labor,” on the other hand, is a fantasy concocted by pampered feminists who spend way too much time in their therapist’s clutches and need to invent reasons to justify all of their internal angst driven by ideological nonsense and probably pharmaceutical drugs and a million other things in the modern West.
Related: Poll: Liberal Women Experience Worst Mental Health of All Demographics
Teachers’ union promotes National Hijab Day for some reason
… That reason, of course, is intersectionality.
Robert Spencer covered this story for PJ Media.
Ironically, callously promoting hijabs as symbols of Islamic feminine empowerment or whatever doesn’t have much to do with teaching kids how to read — ostensibly the business that public school teachers are in — but it definitely has a lot to do with promoting a specific kind of left-wing ideology.
Via National Education Association (emphasis added):
Muslim students in the United States—from middle school through college and university—are experiencing harassment, discrimination, and bullying at scary rates, surveys show.
On college campuses, 49% of Muslim students experienced harassment or discrimination due to their Muslim identity, they told the Council on American–Islamic Relations-CA in 2024. More than one in three felt targeted by professors; more than half by their peers.
Among middle and high school Muslim students, 47 percent report feeling "unsafe, unwelcome, or uncomfortable" at school because of their identities. One in four say they've heard a teacher or other adult at school make offensive comments or act in a way offensive to Muslims. For students who wear hijabs, it's especially threatening: about a third say their hijab has been pulled off or touched in an offensive way.
So an organization with an incentive to drum up as much alleged Islamophobia as possible to justify its existence and rake in more cash money conducts a survey of Muslims, who then report subjective experiences of “harassment” or whatever when prompted, and this is taken at face value, necessitating that “female-identifying” public schoolteachers wear hoods over their heads in solidarity.
And this is what the nation’s largest teachers’ union decides to devote its resources to.
Related: WATCH: Teachers' Union President Seemingly Channels Demon, Speaks in Tongues
19th Amendment: Giant mistake?
Let me just offer at the outset here that I’m not advocating its repeal. A few reasons include:
- Even if it were a good idea, repealing the 19th Amendment is logistically an impossibility at this junction in history, as the P***y Hat riots that would ensue would probably shut down the economy and cause widespread social and economic chaos.
- Also, obviously, women voters aren’t a monolith, as evidenced by polling.
- Plus, human rights and whatever.
But if I were litigating it in court, hypothetically, I’d probably play this clip over and over and over.
This is an absolutely devastating 43 seconds for the 19th amendment pic.twitter.com/WWYcH2XgII
— Clint Russell (@LibertyLockPod) January 15, 2025
