Comedian John Cleese of Monty Python fame has come up with a brilliant new word to describe the Islamic takeover of Britain, and I think we Americans should come up with the equivalent.
“I'd like to suggest that promoting child marriage, stoning, halal animal torture, wife beating, sharia courts, and other behaviour contrary to British values, should now be referred to as Anglophobia,” Cleese posted on X August 24.
We could just as accurately describe this Islamist invasion as Americanophobia or even Occidentalophobia — that is, fear of the foundational beliefs of the U.S. or the West. Or maybe, since it is more hatred than fear, we could use a word like mis-Angly, mis-Americanry, or misoccidentalism. If you think of your own version, drop it in the comments below.
Whichever word you use, the important thing is to keep hammering the root issue: that Third World barbarians are invading our countries and demanding that we change completely to suit them. And the same leftists who decry colonialism, the patriarchy, and military invasion are delighted with the colonialism, toxic patriarchy, and immigrant invasion of the Muslim hordes.
Read Also: Iranian Officials Defy Trump, Making Economic Showdown Certain
You are all probably tired of hearing me and my colleagues state that Islamic sacred texts and sharia (which are NOT like Catholic canon law, no matter what Abdul El-Sayed says) explicitly endorse such atrocities as jihad, pedophilia, sex slavery, polygamy, domestic abuse, religious persecution, ethnic genocide, honor killings, forced conversions, and torture. And as author and former Muslim Dan Burmawi has warned us, “sharia is the constitution of the Islamic state. Its true counterpart is the United States Constitution. The difference between the Islamic state and a country like the United States is that Islam has no borders, it has frontiers.”
In other words, whether the Muslims are coming from Morocco, Iraq, Gaza, Lebanon, Nigeria, the DRC, Sudan, Burma, Syria, Somalia, or any other Islamic country, they all have a goal of seeing Islam conquer the world. These are not people who want to assimilate.
That is precisely why Cleese is right to flip the argument on its head, reject the label of Islamophobia, and point out that the invaders are the problem, not the natives. Immigrants once came to America or to other Western nations in order to become a part of our culture and our political system. That is not what most of the Muslims who come now wish. Yes, there are some of them who end up rejecting Islam and falling in love with freedom. But even most of those who are not strictly devout Muslims retain a lot of their poisonous views, even sometimes down multiple generations, like El-Sayed or Zohran Mamdani or Sadiq Khan.
The picture on this article is from America, in Michigan. I recently wrote about how the Islamic infiltration of our institutions and mass migration are really a revolution. The many Islamic candidates and politicians, the huge wave of antisemitism, the obsession with Gaza, and the enclaves of Muslims in countless states are all part of the transformation of America just as the UK is being transformed. And if we want to be on the winning side, we need to start taking the existential threat seriously.
