Get PJ Media on your Apple

The PJ Tatler

by
Bridget Johnson

Bio

November 11, 2012 - 12:22 pm
Page 1 of 2  Next ->   View as Single Page

The chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee said that the timeline of the FBI’s investigation into the Petraeus emails in relation to campaign season “doesn’t add up.”

“First of all, I’m wondering — excuse me, how a — something about emails went to the level of the FBI, how the FBI could have been investigating it this long, and yet, you know, General Petraeus was involved — or Director Petraeus was involved,” Rep. Peter King (R-N.Y.) said this morning on CNN’s State of the Union.

“To me, if it was the FBI the director had the obligation to tell the president or the National Security Council at the earliest state. So it seems this has been going on for several months and, yet, now it appears that they’re saying that the FBI didn’t realize until Election Day that General Petraeus was involved,” King continued. “It just doesn’t add up, that you have this type of investigation. The FBI investigating emails, the emails leading to the CIA director, and it taking four months to find out that the CIA director was involved.”

“I think the FBI has to come forward and tell exactly when they began the investigation, why it reached that level, when they first realized that General Petraeus might be involved, and at the time they did realize he was involved, did they go to the White House, did they go to the National Security Council? Because obviously this was a matter involving a potential compromise of security, and the president should have been told about it at the earliest state. That’s really all I’m saying. How the FBI got involved? How long it was going on? Did they get a court order? Was it a federal court order for this email surveillance? You know, what was contained in that order? When did they realize that it possibly involved the CIA director?”

Sen. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.), accused before the election of visiting hookers (charges which he has denied), countered that he doesn’t “see a conspiracy behind every curtain, as some of my colleagues do.”

“There was a threat by one individual against another. That individual went to the FBI in the pursuit of that review of that threat. They came upon access to emails of Mr. Petraeus and — with this individual, and they are concerned that maybe that his personal emails had been hacked and, therefore, the possibility of a security threat,” Menendez said. “And I think that if that is the sequence of events, that’s perfectly understandable. Obviously, you know, there was a discussion between Jim Clapper and Petraeus. And there was a decision by General Petraeus that it was in his best interest of himself, the agency, and his family to resign.”

Click here to view the 27 legacy comments

Comments are closed.

2 Trackbacks to “Senate Intelligence Panel to Probe Why Congress Wasn’t Told About Petraeus Investigation”