05-23-2018 10:30:41 AM -0700
05-18-2018 12:27:15 PM -0700
05-17-2018 08:38:50 AM -0700
05-11-2018 07:34:04 AM -0700
05-09-2018 10:17:16 AM -0700
It looks like you've previously blocked notifications. If you'd like to receive them, please update your browser permissions.
Desktop Notifications are  | 
Get instant alerts on your desktop.
Turn on desktop notifications?
Remind me later.

Phony Town Halls and Candy Crowley's Ego

The U.S. population clock is currently showing 314,583,682 residents as of October 2012 and yet we are about to hold a "town hall" debate for our presidential candidates.

How quaint. (The first town hall meeting was held in Dorchester, Massachusetts, in 1633.)

How completely and utterly phony.

Let's begin with how the audience--those town hallers--are chosen. According to Gallup, the organization that selects them, they are "uncommitted" voters. But how do we know that is true? And to what degree are they really uncommitted? What finally does "uncommitted"--the term used by Gallup Editor-in-Chief Frank Newport on this video--mean anyway? How "uncommitted"? Are they leaning in one direction or another? Are they just people anxious to get on television for their Warhol minutes?

In any case this will be a Gallup-selected group of "eighty plus people" (again Newport's words) who will be sitting in for three hundred plus million Americans. That's some winnowing down. How exactly did that get done?

And then we have the matter of their questions. Gallup, in conjunction with moderator Candy Crowley of CNN, will apparently be vetting and making the decisions. In fact, Crowley, who seems to be taking a fair amount of power for herself in the enterprise, has informed us that she "does not intend to be a fly on the wall."

Why not? Crowley is a decent enough journalist, but who elected her king in this enterprise? As Drudge reminds us, not long ago she pronounced the Romney/Ryan ticket a "death wish."