ABC News reports that a “‘fired up’ President Barack Obama took the stage in North Carolina today to stump for his onetime political rival Hillary Clinton, being greeted by the crowed with thunderous applause and saying no one has been ‘more qualified for this office than Hillary Clinton.'”
Clinton, fresh off the news that the FBI didn’t recommend charges against her for using a private email server for government correspondence when she was secretary of state, took the stage first to chants of “Hillary, Hillary, Hillary.” She said she has known Obama in many roles and called him “a friend.”
Obama’s encomium took on the overtones of irony. The FBI’s simultaneous admission of Hillary’s negligence and their inability to bring charges against it dismayed many observers. James Comey said with a faint air of resignation “although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case. … To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now.”
What they were deciding was whether they could make it stick against Hillary and the conclusion was that they couldn’t.
Andrew McCarthy a former prosecutor wrote that “in essence, in order to give Mrs. Clinton a pass, the FBI rewrote the statute, inserting an intent element that Congress did not require. The added intent element, moreover, makes no sense: The point of having a statute that criminalizes gross negligence is to underscore that government officials have a special obligation to safeguard national defense secrets; when they fail to carry out that obligation due to gross negligence, they are guilty of serious wrongdoing. The lack of intent to harm our country is irrelevant.”
Rewrote it at the behest of whom? And to what ultimate effect? Whether or not they are irrelevant is the issue which now intrudes into what was already an extraordinary presidential race. Just as Brexit came to be about British independence rather than foreign policy, the FBI decision not to prosecute Hillary may, for some voters, change 2016 from a presidential contest to a referendum on the rule of law. It may no longer be about Trump vs Hillary but the Proles vs the Party.
Follow Wretchard on Twitter
Support the Belmont Club by purchasing from Amazon through the links below.
Recently purchased by readers:
Making the Unipolar Moment: U.S. Foreign Policy and the Rise of the Post-Cold War Order, In the late 1970s, the United States often seemed to be a superpower in decline. Yet just over a decade later, by the early 1990s, America’s global primacy had been reasserted in dramatic fashion. How did this remarkable turnaround occur, and what role did U.S. foreign policy play in causing it? In this book, author Hal Brands uses recently declassified archival materials to tell the story of American resurgence.
One Second After, From New York Times bestselling author William R. Forstchen, a story in which one man struggles to save his family and his small North Carolina town after America loses a war, in one second, a war based upon a weapon, an Electro Magnetic Pulse (EMP).
Teacher Man: A Memoir (The Frank McCourt Memoirs), This is Pulitzer Prize winning author Frank McCourt’s long-awaited book about how his 30-year teaching career shaped his second act as a writer. With his usual irreverent wit and heartbreaking honesty, McCourt records the trials, triumphs and surprises he faced in public high schools around New York City. “Doggedness,” he says, is “not as glamorous as ambition or talent or intellect or charm, but still the one thing that got me through the days and nights.”
This Is Your Brain on Parasites: How Tiny Creatures Manipulate Our Behavior and Shape Society, Author Kathleen McAuliffe investigates the myriad ways that parasites control how other creatures — including humans — think, feel, and act.
The Great Debate: Edmund Burke, Thomas Paine, and the Birth of Right and Left, For more than two centuries, American political life has been divided between a party of progress and a party of conservation. Author Yuval Levin shows that American partisanship originated in the debates over the French Revolution, fueled by the views of the men who best represent each side of that debate: Edmund Burke and Thomas Paine.
Did you know that you can purchase some of these books and pamphlets by Richard Fernandez and share them with your friends? They will receive a link in their email and it will automatically give them access to a Kindle reader on their smartphone, computer or even as a web-readable document.
The War of the Words, Understanding the crisis of the early 21st century in terms of information corruption in the financial, security and political spheres
Rebranding Christianity, or why the truth shall make you free
The Three Conjectures, reflections on terrorism and the nuclear age
Storming the Castle, why government should get small
No Way In at Amazon Kindle. Fiction. A flight into peril, flashbacks to underground action.
Storm Over the South China Sea, how China is restarting history in the Pacific
Tip Jar or Subscribe or Unsubscribe to the Belmont Club