Ed Meese: Trump’s Travel Ban ‘Clearly’ Legal, Should Be Upheld
WASHINGTON – Edwin Meese, former U.S. attorney general in the Reagan administration, told PJM that President Trump “clearly” has the constitutional authority to implement his executive order restricting travel from certain Muslim-majority countries.
Meese predicted that the order would be “upheld” in the appeals process if judges follow the Constitution.
Meese also told PJM he supports Trump’s executive order on blocking federal funding to sanctuary cities, which was blocked by a federal judge.
PJM asked Meese if he is satisfied with the Trump administration’s strategy of issuing executive orders on sanctuary cities and travel restrictions, rather than involving Congress.
“Yes, I think what the president is trying to do both in terms of deregulation, getting rid of unnecessary regulations that are only hurting the economy, I think what he’s done in terms of his appointments, certainly to the cabinet and the other appointments, are excellent, particularly the Supreme Court appointment of Justice Gorsuch, so I think they’ve done very well,” he said during an interview after the recent Republican National Lawyers Association’s Annual National Policy Conference.
When asked if the volume of executive orders issued under the Trump administration is inviting criticism from Democrats, Meese replied, “I don’t think the executive orders give them the openings for attack. I think what has happened is you have a group that have classified themselves as the resistance to good government and I think that’s the reason why you have all these legal battles.”
The Trump administration is currently involved in a legal battle over its executive order that restricts travel from Iran, Sudan, Yemen, Syria, Somalia and Libya, and pauses the admission of refugees. Meese said the executive action is “clearly within the province” of the president’s powers.
“I think the concept of a temporary limitation on travel from countries, which are identified by the Obama administration as the source of terrorism, that it is appropriate to make sure we have the necessary vetting process in place before those people start coming into this country. It’s a temporary step in order to protect people in the United States from potential terrorists and I find nothing wrong with it,” Meese said.
“As a matter of a fact, I think, particularly as it was corrected, refined in the second order, the one that’s in effect right now, I think it’s very appropriate and I think certainly the power to issue such an order, which was what was attached by those who opposed it and the idea of the order itself, is clearly within the province of the president of the United States under the Constitution dating all the way back to 1787,” he added.
PJM asked Meese if he thinks the court is going to uphold the executive action.