Stephen Colbert showed up to the grand opening of the Obama Presidential Center in Chicago wearing a tan suit. It wasn't an accident, and it wasn't a fashion risk. It was a tribute, a wink, a nod to one of the most bizarre and stupid fake narratives in modern Democrat Party folklore. And the pathetic thing is that the left can let go of its obsession with it.
Leftist influencer Harry Sisson, who never misses a chance to manufacture grievance on behalf of the Democrat Party, posted:
Stephen Colbert wore a tan suit to the Obama Presidential Center ceremony. MAGA is going to lose it pic.twitter.com/8E2YR732aB
— Harry Sisson (@harryjsisson) June 18, 2026
Nobody on the right was losing anything. Literally no one on the right cares. The only people still talking about a suit color from 2014 are the people who built an entire mythology around it.
Here's what actually happened. Obama wore the tan suit on Aug. 28, 2014, at a White House press conference about the U.S. military response to the Islamic State in Syria. The suit immediately became a topic of conversation among reporters, political journalists, television personalities (last I checked, they’re mostly leftists), and social media users who were simply reacting to his choice of wardrobe.
Did conservative commentators eventually weigh in? Sure, but they were responding to a conversation the mainstream media had already started.
Obama's supporters, naturally, saw an opportunity. They turned the suit into a symbol of unfair right-wing criticism, then later into a symbol of his supposedly "scandal-free" presidency. Today's retelling has it completely backward.
Recommended: The Left Hates Trump so Much That It's Trying to Sabotage the Reflecting Pool
It's the left-wing media that has spent over a decade memorializing this nothing story. The left-wing media even marked the fifth anniversary of the dang suit. Chris Hayes of then-MSNBC marked the suit's fifth anniversary with a segment titled "Remembering Obama's biggest scandal: the tan suit."
CNN, the same network that once treated Donald Trump getting two scoops of ice cream as a national controversy during his first term, described the tan suit as causing "a divisive disturbance in America's normal sartorial acceptance of the President's choices." The Washington Post called it a "huge controversy" and framed it as proof of "the relative dearth of scandals during the Obama administration."
And that’s the real point of it all. Democrats keep clinging to the tan suit because they need something to represent Obama’s “scandal-free” presidency by presenting the tan suit as the only scandal.
The truth is that Obama's presidency was packed with legit scandals from start to finish. I should know; I wrote a book on them. There was the Senate seat-for-sale scandal before he even took office, and another soon followed with the New Black Panther Party voter intimidation case his Justice Department refused to prosecute. I’m not going to list all the scandals here, but I will note that his administration spied on Donald Trump's campaign before he ever left office, and no one can pretend that wasn’t a scandal.
Colbert’s suit was an admission of just how far the left has gone in mythologizing Obama into virtual sainthood. It has built a narrative that his presidency was essentially scandal-free. That’s exactly why it keeps clinging to the tan suit. It’s all about protecting a carefully constructed image of Obama that can’t withstand the scrutiny of the actual record.
