Even as globalist elites frantically try to claim that the fake climate crisis is worse than ever and demand a war footing, new evidence keeps confirming that the alarmists are even more wrong now than ever. That makes over 60 years of striking out on every single major prediction.
A study came out last month that found evidence from multiple sources indicating that so-called fossil fuels drive only a small fraction of carbon emissions, about which we are always hearing doom prophecies. It was published soon before the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) admitted that this year‘s Atlantic hurricane season was completely free from direct hits on the United States.
And since carbon is actually a necessary building block for all life on earth, including humans, efforts to cut carbon are in fact anti-life. When elites try to restrict private transportation or gas stoves or ordinary citizens’ travel and meat consumption, they are not interested in saving the planet; they are interested in control.
First, let’s look at a short passage from the November study published in Science of Climate Change out of Norway:
The stock-to-outflow ratio of CO₂ molecules in the atmosphere is about five years. Accordingly, only about 5.5% of the atmospheric CO₂ stock comes from fossil fuel emissions not yet absorbed by vegetation or oceans, while 94.5% originates from natural outgassing of oceans and soils. This interpretation is supported by the δ¹³C record at Mauna Loa Observatory (MLO). The 50% increase in vegetation productivity since 1900 can be attributed to higher atmospheric CO₂ concentrations and a longer growing season. Decarbonization policies may therefore affect only 5.5% of atmospheric CO₂.
The abstract continues from there with more data, but since it is in equally technical language, it is easier simply to say that the findings do not align with climate alarmist claims.
Read Also: Alina Habba Resigns After Woke Court Campaign
Speaking of reality that does not conform with climate alarmism, the mainstream media that has used every hurricane as an excuse to scream about climate change is strangely silent on the subject of new NOAA data that goes through Nov. 30. “For the first time in a decade, not a single hurricane struck the U.S. this season, and that was a much needed break,” confessed NOAA official Neil Jacobs, Ph.D., as Climate Depot reported. While there was a tropical storm that hit the Carolinas, and aftereffects of distant ocean hurricanes did impact the East Coast, no full-blown hurricane struck the United States from the Atlantic.
But did that convince our globalist elites to stop screaming about climate change? Many did not. While a Newsweek op-ed hailed “The Welcome Demise of Climate Change Catastrophism,” Democrats are focusing more on a change in rhetoric rather than a full rejection of climate alarmism. That’s why they saw the Trump administration’s boycott of COP30 as important. Democrat California Gov. Gavin Newsom attended the conference and formed new partnerships. The reality is the Democrats are realizing that voters don’t care about climate rhetoric the way they used to, but that doesn’t mean they are willing to sacrifice their climate agenda altogether.
Meanwhile, overseas, elites are much more open about their continuing dedication to climate propaganda. The UK National Emergency Briefing at the end of November asserted that climate change is such a massive threat that a “war-time footing is necessary.” Meanwhile, the United Nations’ COP30 summit ended with a pledge of over $1 trillion annually dedicated to climate projects.
Western citizens are increasingly awake to climate lies, and the data is on our side, but that is not going to stop the elites from a last-ditch effort to enforce tyranny with the excuse of climate change.
