Documenting the West’s descent into Satanic receivership at the hands of the gender goblins and their allies in media and government.
Giggle vs. Tickle legal update
I have reported previously upon the sordid tale of a tranny down under called Roxanne Tickle and its years-long lawsuit against a women-only dating app called Giggle.
Related: 'Transgender Woman' Roxanne Tickle Sues Women-Only App for 'Discrimination'
The TL;DR for the case is that Tickle submitted its profile picture to the app, the app rejected it because it clearly depicted a man (and a notably unattractive one at that), and Tickle then won a judgment against the app, which has been on appeal for years at this point.
After years of legal wrangling, an Australian Federal Court has finally weighed in — on the side of Tickle, who is set to receive a $20,000 check for all of its alleged pain and suffering, and against basic reality and common sense.
Via Rebel News (emphasis added):
Australia’s Federal Court has delivered its long-awaited judgment in the Giggle v Tickle appeal, finding in favour of Roxanne Tickle.
The full court, made up of Justices Melissa Perry, Geoffrey Kennett and Wendy Abraham, handed down the decision today after a two-day hearing last August.
The case involved Sall Grover, founder of the women-only social networking app Giggle, who had removed Roxanne Tickle, a biological male who identifies as a transgender woman, from the platform. Grover appealed an earlier 2024 ruling that found the exclusion amounted to indirect discrimination. Tickle cross-appealed, seeking a finding of direct discrimination and higher damages.
The court ruled that Giggle and Grover directly discriminated against Tickle on the ground of gender identity by excluding them based on their gender-related appearance, as shown in a selfie, and then refusing to readmit them.
The judges agreed with the original decision on the interpretation of special measures under the Sex Discrimination Act, concluding that the app’s women-only policy did not provide a defence in this instance. They increased the damages award to $20,000, taking into account what they described as aggravating conduct by Grover.
This is what the #Australia Federal Court has determined is the female victim of discrimination by women-only dating app #Giggle pic.twitter.com/ANRaHK26bR
— Ben Bartee (@BenBartee) May 15, 2026
Related: ‘Adult Baby’ Terrorizes Multiple Daycares With Feces
Tickle’s lawsuit, as one would expect, received support from all the usual “human rights” groups, with extensive implications far beyond whether trannies have an inherent, divinely-ordained “human right” to invade dating apps.
The last avenue of appeal for Giggle is the High Court.
Continuing:
Tickle has received strong institutional support both inside and outside the courtroom, as well as online support from progressive trans rights groups. The Sex Discrimination Commissioner Anna Cody, the Australian Human Rights Commission, and the activist group Equality Australia have all backed their case. Equality Australia told the court that “sex” in the Act is not limited to biology, but can also include social recognition and personal identity.
Grover [founder of Giggle] is expected to seek leave to appeal to the High Court of Australia. The outcome is likely to influence future cases involving women-only services, sports, and public spaces across the country.
The simple solution, if I might be so bold as to offer one, to all of this “human rights” nonsense is a full-throated legal restoration of the concept of free association, which was undermined (at least in the context of the United States) by the 1960s-era civil rights movement.
