Chronicling the ongoing intersectional struggle to liberate women — inclusively defined as the legacy kind and the transgender individuals — from the Patriarchy™, one microaggression at a time.
I once again am going back on my solemn pledge that I had forsworn, once and for all, in the interest of healing the nation, having milked the anti-ICE Karen teat nearly dry, reporting on these people any more.
All apologies.
Let’s try to be supportive.
Karen ‘doesn’t want to hear’ the word ‘illegal’ from white people living on ‘stolen land’, claims laws aren’t real
Anti-ICE Karen goes full postmodern
— Ben Bartee (@BenBartee) March 10, 2026
Never go full postmodern pic.twitter.com/5DAclfec5o
Related: Yale ‘Fascism Professor’ Flees Country to Escape Trump’s Fourth Reich
There is, admittedly, a logic to this reductionist, postmodern view that the sovereignty of the nation-state, legal systems, etc., are all invented concepts with no basis in reality.
The lines between states have been drawn and redrawn ad infinitum throughout history, and will continue to be, which poses an interesting thought experiment about how natural or sustainable the current geopolitical system actually is.
One problem with her theory, however, is that if you accept the premise and take it to its logical conclusion like any good German philosopher would, we’re back to a Hobbesian law-of-the-jungle system, which this lady would not ideologically support if you presented it to her as an alternative to the present system of borders and laws governing human behavior within these borders.
Another issue is that the “natives” of the Americas — who, by the way, immigrated from Asia many thousands of years ago across the Bering Strait — continuously stole land from each other, often in the most brutal fashion imaginable, for thousands of years before the arrival of the Europeans, who prevailed not because they were more violent or ruthless but because they had superior strategy and equipment.
I doubt she’s really thought any of this stuff through, though; a coherent political philosophy isn’t the point, after all — the point is dutifully hating white people like she’s been trained to.No matter how much sophistic lipstick gets applied to that pig, it all boils down, in the end, to hating whitey.
On that note, the other problem with this lady’s worldview is that she would never, ever apply the same standards in the opposite direction.
Guaranteed, if you asked her if the Dutch had a license to colonize South Africa, which, according to her logic, is a fictitious entity that doesn’t really exist — even sparsely populated as it was at the time, and not populated at all by the current inhabitants who migrated from the north much later — and turn its barren land into a cornucopia of crops through diligent stewardship, she would spit out some combination of well-tread terms like “white supremacist” or “colonialism” or whatever.
Related: Trump Slashes ALL South Africa Aid, Cites Anti-White Government Policy
She would never criticize the genocidal communist blacks of South Africa, committed to killing or driving the Boers out of the country, just like they did in Rhodesia to devastating effect, because “no one is illegal.”
According to Social Justice™ dogma, standards of acceptable behavior only ever apply to whites — because reasons.
Also guaranteed: even bringing up her obvious hypocrisy and double standard, no matter how politely or how good-faith the questioning might be, would immediately be branded as “racist.”
Asking questions, provided you’re white or if the premise of your question isn’t “white people are evil,” is also racist.
