Archiving the “strange death of Europe,” as Douglas Murray put it, at the hands of the Brussels bureaucracy and its hordes of imported “migrants.”
British government secretly imported 24,000 Afghan migrants, barred media reporting under ‘superinjunction’ gag order
In 2022, a British intelligence official reportedly leaked the names of 18,000 Afghans who may have collaborated with allied forces during the occupation.
As a result, never to let a good crisis go to waste, the British government instituted “Operation Rubific,” which resettled 24,000 Afghans in the UK over two years so as to protect them from retaliation by the Taliban.
However, the citizens of the UK were barred from knowing about any of this via a “superinjunction” issued by the British High Court “against the world,” prohibiting any media outlet from reporting under threat of prosecution for contempt — the first such edict of its kind, ever.
Related: Polish High Court Rules National Sovereignty Supersedes EU Authority, EU Sues
Indeed, even revealing the existence of the superinjunction itself was grounds for contempt prosecution.
Via The Times (emphasis added):
John Healey, the defence secretary, said he had felt “deeply uncomfortable” about what happened and apologised on behalf of the government after senior MPs criticised the draconian gagging order.
Tan Dhesi, the Labour chairman of the defence select committee, told Times Radio the data breach and superinjunction were “an absolute mess and wholly unacceptable” as he said he was “minded” to carry out an investigation given the “serious ramifications”…
A superinjunction — the first to be deployed by the government and the longest ever — which prevented anyone revealing even the existence of such an order, was put in place in September 2023. As it was lifted on Tuesday, after a two-year legal battle spearheaded by The Times, there were concerns in government about the risk of rioting because of the secret scheme bringing in thousands of Afghans.
To recap:
- The government messes up and leaks the names of collaborators in a 20+-years-long war that had morphed from a counterterrorism operation into a nation-building project for the alleged sake of Democracy™ and feminism — in a culture aggressively hostile to both Western democracy and feminism without any of the historical underpinnings that fueled the rise of such concepts like Christianity, the Reformation, the Renaissance, or the Enlightenment
Related: Afghan Migrant Sexually Assaults Incapacitated German Teen on Subway Platform 'for Hours'
Via The Gender Policy Report (emphasis added):
Twenty years after they were initially ousted by the US invasion, the Taliban returned to power in 2021. Afghan women and their perspectives were systematically excluded from the US-Taliban peace process. After decades of serving as an international symbol of women’s oppression, the erasure of Afghan women from the exit process is evidence of the failure to create effective and equal transnational feminist networks (TFNs).
TFNs could have helped uplift Afghan women’s narratives about their exclusion from the US-Taliban peace process but that didn’t happen. If we are to ever build meaningful transnational solidarities and create a truly feminist foreign policy regarding Afghanistan, feminist activists, organizations, and policymakers from and beyond the US must acknowledge and address power disparities within TFNs…
In the months following 9/11, the FMF and other feminist groups collaborated with the US-led war machine by justifying “saving Afghan women.” Mainstream media picked up the simplified story of Afghan women’s oppression at the hands of the Taliban and inundated the public with it. Military and political intervention became seen as a legitimate means of promoting gender equality.
The marriage of the military-industrial complex and third-wave feminism — a match made in hell.
- Then, to remedy the mess it made itself, the UK government decides it’s simply going to import tens of thousands of Third World migrants without the consent or even knowledge of the citizens it allegedly serves
- To prevent any dissent, the government criminalizes not just the revelation of the program but even revealing the very existence of the injunction it put in place.
That’s what we call Democracy™.
