PJM EXCLUSIVE: Ex-Diplomats Report New Benghazi Whistleblowers with Info Devastating to Clinton and Obama
More whistleblowers will emerge shortly in the escalating Benghazi scandal, according to two former U.S. diplomats who spoke with PJ Media Monday afternoon.
These whistleblowers, colleagues of the former diplomats, are currently securing legal counsel because they work in areas not fully protected by the Whistleblower law.
According to the diplomats, what these whistleblowers will say will be at least as explosive as what we have already learned about the scandal, including details about what really transpired in Benghazi that are potentially devastating to both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.
The former diplomats inform PJM the new revelations concentrate in two areas — what Ambassador Chris Stevens was actually doing in Benghazi and the pressure put on General Carter Ham, then in command of U.S. Africa Command (AFRICOM) and therefore responsible for Libya, not to act to protect jeopardized U.S. personnel.
Stevens’ mission in Benghazi, they will say, was to buy back Stinger missiles from al-Qaeda groups issued to them by the State Department, not by the CIA. Such a mission would usually be a CIA effort, but the intelligence agency had opposed the idea because of the high risk involved in arming “insurgents” with powerful weapons that endanger civilian aircraft.
Hillary Clinton still wanted to proceed because, in part, as one of the diplomats said, she wanted “to overthrow Gaddafi on the cheap.”
This left Stevens in the position of having to clean up the scandalous enterprise when it became clear that the “insurgents” actually were al-Qaeda – indeed, in the view of one of the diplomats, the same group that attacked the consulate and ended up killing Stevens.
The former diplomat who spoke with PJ Media regarded the whole enterprise as totally amateurish and likened it to the Mike Nichols film Charlie Wilson’s War about a clueless congressman who supplies Stingers to the Afghan guerrillas. “It’s as if Hillary and the others just watched that movie and said ‘Hey, let’s do that!’” the diplomat said.
He added that he and his colleagues think the leaking of General David Petraeus’ affair with his biographer Paula Broadwell was timed to silence the former CIA chief on these matters.
Regarding General Ham, military contacts of the diplomats tell them that AFRICOM had Special Ops “assets in place that could have come to the aid of the Benghazi consulate immediately (not in six hours).”
Ham was told by the White House not to send the aid to the trapped men, but Ham decided to disobey and did so anyway, whereupon the White House “called his deputy and had the deputy threaten to relieve Ham of his command.”
The White House motivation in all this is as yet unclear, but it is known that Ham retired quietly in April 2013 as head of AFRICOM.
PJ Media recognizes this is largely hearsay, but the two diplomats sounded quite credible. One of them was in a position of responsibility in a dangerous area of Iraq in 2004.
We will report more as we learn it.







In more reasonable times, that was called TREASON and they would be tried in a court of law and hung if found guilty.
Well even if this is true, the President only learned about it when he read your emails.
Dig deeper that that...and find out what we needed Stevens in Benghazi for in the first place.
And...what was so urgent about toppling Qaddhafi that Obama/Clinton didn't want Congress to know?
This story isn't done. But great work, Roger.
NOW...we are just beginning to get the first clods of dirt lifted off the cover of this buried story. We needed a deeper shovel.
WHO benefits from us toppling Libya? HOW do they benefit? Why did we have to put Ambassador Stevens at risk in Benghazi and why did his pleas for tighter security fall on "aggressively deaf" ears?
WHO were we partnered with on the underbelly of the Libya escapade? And who double-crossed Obama/Clinton...such that they now have to angrily and mendaciously target anyone and everyone who whistleblows, testifies, refuses to go along, or investigates.
Watch yourself, Roger. Your in deep waters here. And the sharks are circling around anyone and everyone who dares to be an American citizen and a patriot these days.
You and PJM are heroes, I've always said that. Maybe the story doesn't need Stanley Kurtz after all. (but...it wouldn't hurt)
Which the naive or those who WILL NOT see as freemasonry of self-appointed, self-selecting, incestuous members with interest still believe are "public serviants". But as with charity, service that begins at home.
Persons who learned to "play the game" of politics as usual at the foot of the masters. Incorporaated their motives, methods and opportunities to achieve wealth and the only power that counts, that over The Lives of Others" beyond the DREAMS of The Fathers. OR avarice.
To become in effect quasi-godlike. When the real thing isn't available, they make substitute, e.g the Kennedy clone WJ Clinton with Distaff Hillary. And now the anointed heir to the crown of Camelot the "New Kennedy" aka Messiah of BH Obama.
With the troupes/troops, disciples, acolytes in Congress and Judiciary marching to pipes and drums of the philosopher kings of academia. Their great thoughts propagated - propaganda - to two or more generations of Youth (Hitler Jugend, Young Consomol ) by Media, entertainment in re-education camps template of "elite" university as their New Age "Red Guards"
Having lulled the populationwith 24/7/365 bread and circuses for the past half century to the necessary torpor they gave them the "Father of the Senate" Edward Kennedy. Then iced their cake with WJ Clinton the "Man Who Loves The Lady In Blue" aka "that woman". And now the Messiah, who when not walking on water, makes the oceans recede.
There's a movie in this. George Clooney and Meryl Streep or maybe Julia Roberts? Can't you already see twenty Oscars even before the ink is dry on the script?
If you read but one of them, probably should make it this:
http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/49761
...and, try to review the article's hyperlink to Montagraph. Montagraph seems a little tin-act, but his work has some serious followers --including an excellent group of Freepers, whose link-laden threads are just a few clicks away.
Hagmann in this 09/25/12 piece points convincingly to the pair of Brennan-driven defense contracters whose ''rogue employees'' in the spring of 2008 sanitized Obama's passport file as the actual producers of the video.
Also want to remind, regarding the Petraus decap, that for a short time after his resignation, as the admin related the long FBI investigation of the Broadwell affair, the approprite congressmen and committee chairmen who should have been immediately and scrupulously advised of an FBI investigation of a serving CIA Director, but were not, were in the news protesting the DOJ over-reach.