Get PJ Media on your Apple

Rubin Reports

Arab-Israeli Conflict: The Neo-Mandate Solution

December 12th, 2013 - 4:13 pm

War without end. That is what the Obama Administration promises the U.S., Israel, and the Palestinians. If the current Obama-Kerry plan for an Israel-Palestinian deal is implemented, scores of Americans would likely die. This was revealed recently by Secretary of State John Kerry, particularly in a speech at the Saban Forum.

By the way, the Saban Forum Speech was made appropriately on December 7th, the anniversary of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. The former head of the Saban Center has also been chosen as negotiator.

The Obama Administration plan is very simple, assuming that everything goes smoothly–which of course it will not.

According to the plan, the United States would gradually create and maintain the agreement by policing an independent Palestinian state.  Israel would be protected by the U.S. forces, and Palestine would be protected from Israel by them. And that’s part of the problem, because the Palestinians would stage a huge number of protests against and complaints regarding Israel’s actions, likely demanding more concessions.

In addition, the Palestinians, particularly Hamas, would see the new Palestinian state as perpetually victimized. They would mobilize any Arab forces they could to back their complaints. It would be a nightmare. But what the wrong-headed people in the Obama Administration do not understand is that they would be under constant challenge. They do not understand that no matter what they say, Hamas, Fatah, Iran, Syria, al-Qa’ida, the Muslim Brotherhood, and the Salafists –and most likely Saudi Arabia–will never accept an Israeli state.

In other words, if Americans are on the ground, they will be targeted. Now the question is what will they do? Will they “protect” Israel? And what is the definition of protecting Israel? If Palestinians ignore that they are attackers, then it is a controversy. Israel does not deserve “protection.” And what about gaps in this protection or disagreement among the observers?

In his Saban speech, Kerry said, “…Our commitment to Israel’s security spurred the U.S.-Israeli development of ballistic missile defense technologies to keep Israelis safe from rockets and missiles. Those systems and newer technologies continue to protect Israelis from the range of threats that they still face today.”

What about a large stream of cross-border attacks? Will Americans attack Palestinians if they violate the agreement? May I point out that at various times Iraqi, Hamas, and Hizballah rockets have landed on Israel with no U.S. defensive action. Again, the most important point is not Iranian nuclear weapons but routine policing of a Palestinian state, not to mention Israel’s Lebanon-Syria border.

Are we to believe that American helicopters, airplanes, and ground soldiers would attack when the whole effort of this exercise had been to avoid military commitments? How many years would this neo-mandate continue? Will the United States intimidate certain countries if necessary? Remember that the United States didn’t even support the military government in Egypt. So will it defend Egypt in the Sinai, which is in cooperation with Israel?

The United States may suffer a great number of casualties over time. Note the 3,400 deaths of Western coalition soldiers in Afghanistan so far. Are Western forces willing to sacrifice more than 300 soldiers a year? In 2010, IED attacks in Afghanistan wounded 3,366 U.S. soldiers. And that was in just one year of the war.

And of course Americans are going to accidently kill Palestinians, both fighters and unarmed civilians. As of February 2013, between 17,000 and 19,000 civilians died in Afghanistan. This then would create a blood-feud. And by the way, many of these people will blame Israel.

Think along the lines of Afghanistan. The U.S. has informed President Karzai that it is withdrawing its forces. Karzai is not happy with that, and he wants to reject the deal. Again, can Israel rely on American defense even if it accepts it?

Recently, the United States has betrayed the following countries; Egypt (wanting to support a Muslim Brotherhood government); Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Turkey (supporting their side in the Syrian civil war). And it has left a mess in Iraq. Do you think at this moment Israel is going to trust the United States at the peak of distrust in modern times? Consider this too, what will happen when the U.S. soldiers come back in body bags? How long will the U.S. commitment last before dumping an independent Palestinian State on Israel? How long will the American people accept photos of dead Palestinians, much less dead Israelis?

Remember clearly that there will be Turks, Iranians, Arabs, Islamists, and Palestinians who will not to accept the solution or who will continue fighting. And sooner or later, the United States would leave the new state and leave Israel with a mess.

Since this will cost a great number of American fatalities; money, conflicts of agreement, interpretation, and prestige in the Middle-East; and constant American interventions, such a solution will not work. I cannot conceive that people do not look forward in this way and rather seem to be guided by wishful thinking that the conflict will end suddenly.

It is no accident that Israel has never been willing to trust its security to a third party. This is a roadmap for increased conflict.

For example, is the U.S. air force going to bomb a building in Gaza that is an open headquarter for Gaza rocket and terrorist attacks? Will it aggressively go after foreign fighters, even if those foreign fighters have attacked Americans? Will it send them to Guantanamo Bay? Will it respond to criticism in the UN? May I point out that U.S. counterterrorism policy has not been very aggressive of late.

Think about Benghazi.

The United States will then have two choices:

  1. The U.S. helps Israel, albeit with constant opposition, and alienates the Arab and Iranian and Turkish world.
  2. The United States will gradually get tired of the burden and walk away from it.

In other words, Israel would not benefit from what can only be called “ObamaStrategicCare.”

If you like it, no matter what you’ve heard, you can keep your strategic patron or plan, you can keep your ally (Obama), and you’ll save money. No one will be able to take that away from you.

Comments are closed.

All Comments   (5)
All Comments   (5)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
"How long will the U.S. commitment last before dumping an independent Palestinian State on Israel?" Given the views of some of Obama's advisers, that is probably the intention.

And of course with direct US involvement in defending Israelis from their enemies, there would be no more need for any US financial support for Israel's military establishment. Obama is saying to Israel "If you like your ability to defend yourself, you can keep your ability to defend yourself."
31 weeks ago
31 weeks ago Link To Comment
Kerry is obviously not much of a student of history. His plan for US intervention is simply the British Mandate Redux. In that sense, the Americans would be trying to do what the British tried but failed to do - i.e. keep both sides apart. We know how well that worked: the British withdrew in good order before they were kicked out but left a horrible mess behind.
31 weeks ago
31 weeks ago Link To Comment
Barry, I suggest moving on from the usual suspects which deliver all that they can deliver.

Who are the Arabs, and not just in Israel, who agree with Bishara Shlayan and Father Gabriel Nadaf? It is time for them to be backed to the hilt, because in all honesty, those who only see Israel in a poor light have had too much clout for far too long.
31 weeks ago
31 weeks ago Link To Comment
I can't see Israel letting either Kerry or Obama's get their nose under the tent.
32 weeks ago
32 weeks ago Link To Comment
Barry,

Israel of course will not agree to it and neither would the Palestinian Arabs. And the American people are tired of taking on military commitments abroad.

President Obama and Secretary Kerry seek the impossible. At a time when the US is exhausted as a hyperpower, it wants to take on one more commitment.

It cannot do both. And this is exactly why this latest Obama Administration scheme will go nowhere as it should.

32 weeks ago
32 weeks ago Link To Comment
View All

One Trackback to “Arab-Israeli Conflict: The Neo-Mandate Solution”