No, I’m not kidding. Here are his own (?) words:
My own view is moving toward supporting a direct American military imposition of a two-state solution, with NATO troops on the borders of the new states of Palestine and Israel.
You can’t counter an argument like that. All you can do is marvel that this is the same man who made so much sense in the hard, scary months after 9/11.
UPDATE: Maybe I’m reading too much into Andrew’s semantics, but he says there should be NATO troops on the borders of “the new states.” States, plural. Does this mean he wants the US Army dismantle the current Jewish state?