The old saying goes that if you don't have something nice to say about someone, then you should say nothing at all. If that were the case, when speaking of former Orange County congressional representative-turned candidate for governor Katie Porter, there would be nothing to say about her. I mean nothing.
This is the woman who poured hot mashed potatoes on her husband because he "was so f***ing stupid". She said during the Joe Biden spendulous-induced inflation, that to afford groceries, American "families" should abort their babies. She lied to her children so ferociously about the "climate catastrophe" that Porter admitted to Greta Thunberg at least one of them thought "the Earth is on fire and we’re all going to die soon." There are a number of complaints from her mashed potato head ex-husband about how he needed custody over his children because the girl be cray. Porter got custody in the end.
Katie Porter wouldn't be the mother on the Titanic, reading calming bedtime stories to her kids so they wouldn't be terrified. She'd be using a whip to get them to clear the way for her to get out of steerage.
Hold on, I'm not done.
You'll note I haven't even gotten to the part of the story that is today's lead. This is the part of the story about Porter's disastrous interview with a CBS reporter that tells voters exactly what she thinks of them.
Recommended: Welcome to Portland, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem
In this disturbing story about Katie Porter, the reporter asking the leftist loon about how she'd reach out to the over 40% of Californians who voted for Donald Trump in 2024 got scolded for asking such a ridiculous question. The answer was another version of Pfft! "Why would I need them in order to win?" she sniffed. Then she laughed out loud and looked at the camera, saying without words, Is that the most ridiculous question you've ever heard?
Watch how @katieporteroc aka “Karen” becomes quickly overwrought during a neutral interview on CBS Sacramento.
— KlausKnowsMe (@KlausKnowsMe) October 7, 2025
Reporter, Julie Watts sat down with each candidate for governor of California to ask direct questions on a variety of issues.
No one should want THIS for California… pic.twitter.com/2QUO5ivGaC
In a straight-up battle between Democrat and Republican, Porter said she'd win in a walk. Normally, I'd say she was right. After Californians saw in real time what a lack of competent leadership looks like following the disastrous fires, loss of billions of dollars in NGO rat holes, and self-dealing, however, things are a bit different this political season.
Porter leads Democrats with 18% of the vote, but Zogby Strategies Polls finds that Republican Steve Hilton leads by six points in a head-to-head match-up 26% to 23%.
It's still a long way from 2026's election, and anything can happen, but a congressman friend told me years ago the first thing a candidate needs is likability. If 10 is the best, Porter is a -10 for likability. She's down there in the muck with Hillary Clinton.
One must be likable if they say things like saying words of support for pedophiles and censoring those who call them "groomers." At least that's the way it sounded when she told an LGBT representative in a congressional hearing that she agreed with censoring people who called some gays "groomers" on Twitter 1.0.
So – I mean, I think you’re absolutely right. And it’s not – this allegation of ‘groomer’ and of ‘pedophile,’ it is alleging that a person is criminal somehow, and engaged in criminal acts, merely because of their identity, their sexual orientation, their gender identity.
Porter is a woman with no unified theory of good or evil. She has no true north. She's a horrible human being. You wouldn't want her for your best friend, and you'd never, ever want her to babysit your children. No, you don't want to go have a beer with her. She's the ball and chain of all time balls and chains and now wants to be the state's official scold in furtherance of all of her fondest socialist fads of the moment.
Glad I could help clear things up.
