A congressman who switched from his shunning of House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) in 2013 to his support today explained his decision to his constituents, saying “The truth is, there was no conservative who could beat John Boehner. Period. People can ignore that, or they can wish it away, but that is reality.”
Reps. Raul Labrador (R-Idaho) and Mick Mulvaney (R-S.C.), who voted present against Boehner in 2013, voted for the speaker this time. Rep. Steve Pearce (R-N.M.), who voted against the speaker in 2013, voted for Boehner.
Mulvaney acknowledged in a statement this evening that his unwillingness to participate in the effort to oust Boehner today “may make some people back home angry.”
“I understand that, but I’ve got some experience with coup attempts against the Speaker, and what I learned two years ago factored heavily in my decision today not to join the mutiny,” he said. “First, I learned two years ago that people lie about how they are going to vote. And you cannot go into this kind of fight with people you do not trust. We walked onto the floor two years ago with signed pledges – handwritten promises – from more than enough people to deny Boehner his job. But when it came time to vote, almost half of those people changed their minds – including some of those who voted against Boehner today. Fool me once, shame on you… Today was even worse: there were never enough votes to oust Boehner to begin with. On top of that, some people who had publicly said in the past that they wouldn’t vote for Boehner did just that.”
Mulvaney called the effort one “driven as much by talk radio as by a thoughtful and principled effort to make a change.”
“It was poorly considered and poorly executed, and I learned first-hand that is no way to fight a battle. This coup today was bound to fail. And in fact, it failed worse than I expected, falling 11 votes short of deposing the Speaker. At least two years ago we only failed by six,” he said.
“I also learned that the Floor of the House is the wrong place to have this battle. The hard truth is that we had an election for Speaker in November – just among Republicans. THAT was the time to fight. But not a single person ran against Boehner. Not one. If they had, we could’ve had a secret ballot to find out what the true level of opposition to John Boehner was. In fact, we could’ve done that as late as Monday night, on a vote of ‘no confidence’ in the Speaker. But that didn’t happen…and at least one of the supposed challengers to Boehner today didn’t even go to the meeting last night. That told me a lot.”
Mulvaney said he was encouraged to vote for Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas), who got three votes today including his own. “I like Louie, but let’s be clear: Louie Gohmert was – is – never ever going to be Speaker of the House. I respect his passion, but he isn’t a credible candidate.”
Mulvaney also noted that Rep. Daniel Webster (R-Fla.), who garnered the most opposition votes with 12, only has a 60 percent rating from Heritage Action while he has 91 percent. “And this was supposed to be the savior of the conservative movement? Would the House really have been more conservative if he had won?”
“The truth is, there was no conservative who could beat John Boehner. Period. People can ignore that, or they can wish it away, but that is reality,” he continued. “Some people tried to argue that voting against Boehner would give conservatives leverage, or somehow force him to lead in a more conservative fashion, even if the coup attempt failed. All I can say to that is that the exact opposite happened two years ago: conservatives were marginalized, and Boehner was even freer to work with moderates and Democrats. My guess is that the exact same thing will happen again now. And I fail to see how that helps anything that conservatives know needs to be done in Washington.”
Mulvaney went against Boehner at the end of the 113th Congress with an amendment to defund President Obama’s executive actions on immigration. It was killed by Chairman Pete Sessions (R-Texas) in the Rules Committee.
“I understand people’s frustration and anger over what is happening in Washington. And I also acknowledge that John Boehner may be partly to blame. But this was a fool’s errand. I am all for fighting, but I am more interested in fighting and winning than I am fighting an unwinnable battle,” Mulvaney said today.
“Finally, the most troubling accusation I have heard regarding the Boehner vote is that I have ‘sold out’ my conservative principles. All I can say is this: take a look at my voting record. It is one of the most conservative in Congress. And I was joined today by the likes of Jim Jordan, Raul Labrador, Trey Gowdy, Mark Sanford, Trent Franks, Tom McClintock, Matt Salmon, Tom Price, Sam Johnson, and Jeb Hensarling. If I ‘sold out’ then I did so joined by some of the most tried and tested conservative voices in Washington.”