12-12-2018 10:18:40 AM -0800
12-12-2018 07:39:32 AM -0800
12-11-2018 02:41:26 PM -0800
12-11-2018 01:01:06 PM -0800
12-11-2018 07:40:58 AM -0800
It looks like you've previously blocked notifications. If you'd like to receive them, please update your browser permissions.
Desktop Notifications are  | 
Get instant alerts on your desktop.
Turn on desktop notifications?
Remind me later.
PJ Media encourages you to read our updated PRIVACY POLICY and COOKIE POLICY.

The Snowflakes of Google

What do Google, Evergreen State College, and Middlebury have in common?

A lot, apparently.  They're filled with "snowflakes" -- those students (in Google's case, employees) who have such a high sensitivity to -- or is it inability to tolerate -- diversity of thought, they dissolve like so many, well, snowflakes.  (Unlike real snowflakes, however, that are different one from the other, these snowflakes tend to be monotonously the same, spewing the same slogans and even wearing, basically, the same clothes.)

People are beginning to get fed up with this jejune politically correct censorship and, just as with the University of Missouri before it, Evergreen State is evidently having trouble getting new students to attend their famously "progressive" institution. Some would prefer to study rather than protest non-stop. Imagine.

Perhaps ultimately more interesting -- after demonstrating a problem with free speech when it fired its software engineer James Damore for the most benign of criticisms -- will Google suffer the same fate as these colleges? Will people turn away to the search engines of companies more attuned with the Bill of Rights and less anxious to be "thought police"? Or will they applaud the females working for Google who, in the grand snowflake tradition, refused to come to work because Damore expressed his opinions in a memo?

Those opinions, of course, are pretty much those that got Larry Summers in trouble at Harvard back in 2005 -- that there were biological reasons that women, in general, did not excel at science as often as men. It's important to underscore that Damore, like Summers, made it very clear these were generalizations with many exceptions. In fact, in Damore's case he offered several good-hearted suggestions for how to overcome this that were, obviously, ignored by Google and its PC-at-all-costs CEO.

Unsaid in all this is that Damore and Summers are the true Darwinians in this argument (i.e. on the side of science). Natural selection, etc., would tend to encourage, not discourage, differentiation between the sexes for purposes of species survival going back so many millennia it's almost impossible to calculate.

And speaking of excelling, as is also well known, women are overwhelming our educational institutions these days, getting college degrees far more often than men in a ratio approaching 60-40.  As Damore points out, they have plenty of skills of their own outside of STEM.  In fact, the way things are going, there's reason to believe that women will be taking over society in the next fifty years, assuming the robots don't.

Still, the snowflake grievance committee goes on, performing the umpteenth rerun of feminism 4.6 or whatever. Silicon Valley seems to be one of the key centers for this, a virtual haven for hypocrisy and virtue signaling while making sums of money unheard of in human history.  It's the world's capital -- or should be -- of "watch what I do, not what I say." You would think that given Google co-founder Sergey Brin's background -- born in Moscow in 1973 -- he would be especially sensitive to the dangers of thought control of any sort.  Evidently not enough, not in Damore's case anyway.