One sign that international power relationships are changing has been the increasing tendency among some countries to strike out on their own. For a long time it was accepted wisdom that there was no future for Britain outside of Europe. Now there is a significant chance that the UK will leave the European Union. London Mayor Boris Johnson and 6 cabinet ministers, including Justice Secretary Michael Gove declared they would campaign for Britain to leave the EU in a referendum to be held in the summer of 2016.
In South Korea, another reversal is taking shape. For the first time in history major South Korean politicians are seriously considering acquiring nuclear weapons, besides taking steps to deploy an anti-ballistic missile system in response to North Korean nuclear tests and missile launches. Old taboos are crumbling at the ground level. The New York Times notes that in “a survey conducted by the Asan Institute for Policy Studies in Seoul shortly after the North’s third nuclear test in 2013, 66.5 percent of respondents supported a homegrown nuclear program.”
Two former senior military officers, one American the other Japanese, described the growing fear in Asia that Washington could no longer be counted on to extend its deterrent umbrella over allies. Retired Admiral Dennis Blair, former CINCPAC is Chairman and Lt. Gen. Masayuki Hironaka (Ret.) former head of the Japanese air force warned “the United States, Japan and Korea must reassess whether American extended deterrence in East Asia is still strong”.
Those doubts may in part be fueled by the behavior of the Obama administration, which allowed itself to be slapped across the face by Pyongyang. “Days before North Korea’s latest nuclear-bomb test, the Obama administration secretly agreed to talks to try to formally end the Korean War, dropping a longstanding condition that Pyongyang first take steps to curtail its nuclear arsenal.” The article explains that Obama was so eager to replicate his Iran deal with North Korea that he led with his chin which gave Kim Jong Un the opportunity to sucker-punch him.
Mr. Obama has pointed to the Iran deal to signal to North Korea that he is open to a similar track with the regime of Kim Jong Un.
Instead the U.S. called for North Korea’s atomic-weapons program to be simply part of the talks. Pyongyang declined the counter-proposal, according to U.S. officials familiar with the events. Its nuclear test on Jan. 6 ended the diplomatic gambit.
The New York Times notes that South Korean skeptics were growing doubtful that Washington would go to the wall for Seoul.
“We must ask ourselves whether the United States will save Seoul at the risk of sacrificing L.A. or San Francisco,” Chung Mong-joon, a former head of the governing party, wrote in a widely circulated blog post, warning of the North’s potential for striking the United States with a nuclear-tipped intercontinental ballistic missile.
Obama was certainly not going to the wall for the rebels it sponsored in Syria. “The Obama administration is allowing moderate Syrian rebels, which the U.S. spent hundreds of millions training and equipping, to be slowly destroyed, experts warn. The groups are targeted by Russian air strikes … The attacks have led to criticism that the administration is standing by while its allies are killed.”
“Beggars can’t be choosers,” said one former Obama official, explaining their administration’s indifference to the rebel’s fate. The lesson cannot have been lost on American allies. With the New York Times reporting that fighting is picking up in Ukraine, many allied countries must seriously be asking themselves how far Obama would go meet multiple simultaneous challenges.
The resumption of hostilities in Ukraine, with exchanges of machine gun and mortar fire across the front line up to levels not seen since last summer, suggests a willingness by Russia, which supports the rebels in eastern Ukraine, to sustain two conflicts at once. In late September, Russia began airstrikes in Syria on behalf of the government of President Bashar al-Assad.
Putin’s strategy of focusing differential pressure on parts of the American alliance was deliberate strategy aaccording to George Will. He argued in 2014 that Putin could leverage Obama’s indecision into stress fractures that Russia could use “break up NATO … if you listen to Putin’s language and watch his body language, it’s obvious that he is having the time of his life and he thinks he is winning.”
The need by countries to defend themselves and the president’s almost perverse inclination to prevent it is putting shear forces on the alliance. That is illustrated by an International Business Times map of NATO expenditures which contrasts the double-digit defense expenditure hikes of Eastern European states with the flat or even negative military budget growth of Western European countries. It is a map of two Europes: one determined to fight for its life, and the other according to the Slovak Prime Minister, equally determined to commit “ritual suicide”. It is telling that the Obama administration has come out forcefully against Britain’s exit from the European Union, that is to say on behalf of suicide.
But last year, when Obama urged Britons to stay in the bloc, he drew near-universal calls for him to butt out of British domestic affairs — underlining the risk that American officials and companies face in inserting themselves into the debate.
“The British public have gone completely skeptical of the United States’ foreign policy intentions,” said Kurt Volker, a former U.S. ambassador to NATO.
That may not have put Obama off, with the president planning another attempt to sway British voters. “I know the president is planning to make a pretty big public reach-out in this regard,” Bob Corker said.
Just as everyone is trying to unshackled the anvil clamped round their legs, Obama is working feverishly to clamp them back on. But foreseeable events are likely to negate Obama’s “big public reach-out”. Events are likely to work against the Narrative. The summer and fall of 2016 will be crucial months. The UK’s decision to stay in the EU will depend largely on whether public fears of uncontrolled immigration can be mitigated by EU pressure on Turkey to stop hundreds of thousands of refugees from reaching European borders. But with Turkey itself in an unprecedented state in crisis it will have other fish to fry and the migrant tide will probably peak in the warm months of June, just as British voters go to the polls, and just as the wars in the Middle East move into high gear.
Obama can say what he likes, but the headlines are likely message against him. With the American presidential elections starting to peak at around then, the last months of 2016 bids fair to be one of the more interesting periods in modern history.
Follow Wretchard on Twitter
Recently purchased by readers:
Generations: The History of America’s Future, 1584 to 2069, Authors William Strauss and Neil Howe posit the history of America as a succession of generational biographies, beginning in 1584 and encompassing every-one through the children of today. Their bold theory is that each generation belongs to one of four types, and that these types repeat sequentially in a fixed pattern. The vision of Generations allows us to plot a recurring cycle in American history — a cycle of spiritual awakenings and secular crises — from the founding colonists through the present day and well into this millenium.
Quantum Enigma: Physics Encounters Consciousness 2nd edition, By Bruce Rosenblum and Fred Kuttner. In the few decades since the Bell’s theorem experiments established the existence of entanglement (Einstein’s “spooky action”), interest in the foundations, and the mysteries, of quantum mechanics has accelerated. In recent years, physicists, philosophers, computer engineers, and even biologists have expanded our realization of the significance of quantum phenomena. This second edition includes such advances.
The Devil’s Pleasure Palace: The Cult of Critical Theory and the Subversion of the West , In the aftermath of World War II, America stood alone as the world’s premier military power. Yet its martial confidence contrasted vividly with its sense of cultural inferiority. Still looking to a defeated and dispirited Europe for intellectual and artistic guidance, the burgeoning transnational elite in New York and Washington embraced not only the war’s refugees, but many of their ideas as well, and nothing has proven more pernicious than those of the Frankfurt School and its reactionary philosophy of “critical theory.” This book by Michael Walsh looks at the ways Critical Theory took root in America and, once established and gestated, has affected nearly every aspect of American life and society – and what can be done to stop it.
A Hobbit, a Wardrobe, and a Great War: How J.R.R. Tolkien and C.S. Lewis Rediscovered Faith, Friendship, and Heroism in the Cataclysm of 1914-18 , The untold story of how the First World War shaped the lives, faith, and writings of J. R. R. Tolkien and C. S. Lewis.
The Fellowship: The Literary Lives of the Inklings: J.R.R. Tolkien, C. S. Lewis, Owen Barfield, Charles Williams, C. S. Lewis is the 20th century’s most widely read Christian writer and J.R.R. Tolkien its most beloved mythmaker. For three decades, they and their closest associates formed a literary club known as the Inklings, which met every week in Lewis’s Oxford rooms and in nearby pubs. They discussed literature, religion, and ideas; read aloud from works in progress; took philosophical rambles in woods and fields; gave one another companionship and criticism; and, in the process, rewrote the cultural history of modern times. In this book, authors Philip and Carol Zaleski offer the first complete account of the ideas, affections and vexations that drove the group’s most significant members.
Did you know that you can purchase some of these books and pamphlets by Richard Fernandez and share them with your friends? They will receive a link in their email and it will automatically give them access to a Kindle reader on their smartphone, computer or even as a web-readable document.
The War of the Words, Understanding the crisis of the early 21st century in terms of information corruption in the financial, security and political spheres
Rebranding Christianity, or why the truth shall make you free
The Three Conjectures, reflections on terrorism and the nuclear age
Storming the Castle, why government should get small
No Way In at Amazon Kindle. Fiction. A flight into peril, flashbacks to underground action.
Storm Over the South China Sea, how China is restarting history in the Pacific
Tip Jar or Subscribe or Unsubscribe to the Belmont Club