TX Democrat Proposes Male Masturbation Ban Because ... Abortion

Advertisement
TX Democrat Proposes Male Masturbation Ban Because ... Abortion
In this April 2, 2009, file photo, Rep. Jessica Farrar, D-Houston, speaks during a news conference in Austin, Texas. (AP Photo/Harry Cabluck, File)

Texas lawmaker Jessica Farrar, a Democrat from Houston, has made a bizarre proposal. She seeks to fine men $100 for masturbating, among other tomfoolery, in a bill she recently put forward.

Advertisement

No, I am not making this crap up. Presumably, she intended to make some sort of statement on abortion. She really did this:

In proposing a fine for masturbation, Farrar says that if a man’s semen is not used to create a pregnancy, “then it’s a waste … because that semen can be used — and is to be used — for creating more human life.”

Farrar continued: “Men have to answer for their actions and so forth. So if there’s going to be an emission, it would have to be done in a hospital where the semen could be preserved for future pregnancies or it would be directly deposited into the vagina of a woman.”

HB 4260 also calls for informed consent for elective vasectomies, colonoscopy procedures and Viagra prescriptions. Consent is informed only if at least 24 hours have passed since a man’s initial health care consultation for the procedure or prescription. The bill would also require a rectal exam before administering an elective vasectomy or colonoscopy procedure, or prescribing Viagra — an exam that the bill acknowledges is medically unnecessary.

Oh, the stupidity.

A man’s semen isn’t equivalent to a fetus. “Sperm cell” is not a stage of life, exactly as a woman’s egg is not a stage of life. Unless Farrar adds to her proposal that women will be fined $100 for every period they have — after all, an egg can be harvested and preserved just as sperm can be — then she’s failing on every level to make a coherent point, although she wouldn’t be anywhere close yet.

Advertisement

The pro-life, science-based argument is that life begins at conception. Everyone knows this.

Additionally, arguing that colonoscopies(?) are equivalent to abortions is asinine. It’s a medical screening procedure that a large number of women undergo each year. And informed consent is already necessary for a colonoscopy — can you imagine cramming a camera up someone’s rectum without it? No, let’s pretend that a man getting an elective vasectomy or colonoscopy or taking Viagra is somehow taking a human life.

This woman is wasting taxpayer money and time to get a nice bit of applause from those who already agree with her and choose not to think terribly hard about the argument being presented.

Then again, a Democrat wasting time and money is hardly newsworthy.

News Topics ABORTION

Comments

VIP

Join the Conversation

VIP members get the ability to comment on articles.

Recommended

Trending on PJ Media Videos