NY Times Op-Ed Writer Says Anyone Who Fears Crazies on the Subway Should Get 'Therapy'

(AP Photo/Richard Drew)

A contributing op-ed writer at the New York Times believes that the danger posed by crazy people on the subway is vastly overblown and that anyone who feels threatened by mentally unbalanced people riding mass transit needs to receive “therapy” for seeing “imaginary monsters.”

Advertisement

Elizabeth Spiers, a Democratic pollster and professor at NYU’s Graduate School of Journalism, made the comment on Twitter responding to NRO’s Dan McLaughlin about the difference between a “free society” and a “polite society.”

McLaughlin questioned what city Spier was talking about.

Twitter got riled up over the argument.

Advertisement

Democratic politicians have made a conscious, deliberate decision to support policies that lead to confrontations of ordinary citizens by people who are off their meds or who should be institutionalized. There’s no mystery here. There’s nothing to “study” or discuss. Politicians who will never be in contact with these disturbed individuals are making policies so that the rest of us are forced to endure their “compassion” toward the mentally ill.

Fox News:

The New York City subway system has developed a reputation as a dangerous hellscape where headline-making incidents occur on a regular basis. Earlier this month, a subway passenger was slashed in the face during a dispute over a seat at around 6 p.m. at Lexington Avenue and East 77 Street in Manhattan.

Several high-profile attacks have taken place on the subway in recent months, including the brutal assault of Fox News meteorologist Adam Klotz and award-winning PBS News reporter Jane Ferguson.

In September, a New York City woman lost her eye in a violent subway attack by a homeless man in a Queens subway station. Her attacker was a career criminal and boasted an extensive rap sheet.

Advertisement

It is lunacy to continue imposing these policies on the general public. And as long as we even refuse to talk about the problem, innocent people are going to continue to be hurt or killed by mentally ill individuals who have no business roaming the streets of a civilized city.

Related: In a World Gone Mad, the Jordan Neelys Rule

It’s not a question of shelters or housing. It’s a question of mental health and what should be done with people who continue to refuse treatment or help. Jordan Neely would still be alive if he had gotten treatment for his depression. In fact, he was on the “Top 50” mentally ill homeless people in need of urgent care list, according to outreach groups. National Review:

Neely was on what outreach workers refer to as the “Top 50” list — a roster maintained by New York City of the homeless people living on the street most urgently in need of assistance and treatment. An unnamed employee of the Bowery Residents’ Committee, a nonprofit organization that does subway outreach for the city, told the New York Timesthat Neely had hundreds of encounters with social workers and was taken to hospitals numerous times, both voluntarily and involuntarily.

Neely also racked up more than three dozen arrests. Many of them were offenses like turnstile-jumping or trespassing. However, at least four were on charges of punching people, two in the subway system.

Advertisement

Neely refused to be helped. But should someone this disturbed be given the choice? Certainly, there are issues of individual liberty. But at what point does the safety of society outweigh the rights of mentally disturbed individuals?

As long as Democratic politicians call those who want such a conversation “cruel” and “heartless,” people are going to continue to die.

Recommended

Trending on PJ Media Videos

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Advertisement
Advertisement