05-23-2018 10:30:41 AM -0700
05-18-2018 12:27:15 PM -0700
05-17-2018 08:38:50 AM -0700
05-11-2018 07:34:04 AM -0700
05-09-2018 10:17:16 AM -0700
It looks like you've previously blocked notifications. If you'd like to receive them, please update your browser permissions.
Desktop Notifications are  | 
Get instant alerts on your desktop.
Turn on desktop notifications?
Remind me later.

Stretch, grab a late afternoon cup of caffeine and get caught up on the most important news of the day with our Coffee Break newsletter. These are the stories that will fill you in on the world that's spinning outside of your office window - at the moment that you get a chance to take a breath.
Sign up now to save time and stay informed!

Dems Demand Answers on President’s ‘Clandestine’ Deregulatory Task Forces

WASHINGTON – House Democrats this week demanded answers from the Trump administration after allegations surfaced that members of presidential task forces are improperly using their positions for financial gain in repealing regulations from the EPA, HUD and other agencies.

In a scathing Aug. 7 letter to Office of Management and Budget Director Mick Mulvaney and OMB Administrator Neomi Rao, the Democrats target various members of the task forces – including individuals with ties to the oil and real estate industries. Reps. John Conyers, Jr. (D-Mich.), Elijah E. Cummings (D-Md.), Gerry Connolly (D-Va.) and David Cicilline (D-R.I.) accuse political appointees “with deep industry ties” of operating in secret without public input and improperly refusing to disclose details about their meetings.

“Rather than ‘drain the swamp,’ these conflicts threaten to influence the outcome of the review process against hardworking Americans and in favor of regulated industries and agency staff,” the letter reads.

President Trump established his Regulatory Reform Task Forces through an executive order in February. Task force members are responsible for providing recommendations on which agency regulations to repeal, as the White House looks to fulfill its promise of loosening what it sees as the needless constraints of bureaucracy.

Citing an investigation by The New York Times and ProPublica, the lawmakers claim that about a third of the task forces’ “identifiable employees” have material conflicts of interests. This includes attorneys who have grappled with the government over regulations, “political dark money groups,” individuals with ties to organizations who would benefit from deregulating agencies like the EPA and “at least three people who were registered to lobby the agencies they now work for.”

One task force member at the EPA is married to a top oil industry lobbyist, while a member at HUD owns real estate subject to regulations under review, the letter noted. The lawmakers also take issue with the “clandestine” manner in which these task forces have been conducting meetings between regulators, lobbyists and trade associations. The investigation showed that at least 58 oil and gas industry representatives met with one deregulatory task force in the span of four months. There is no record of what was discussed or what actions were taken after the meetings, the letter noted. The Executive Branch would be in violation of the Federal Records Act if it’s not maintaining meeting records, the lawmakers continued.

“These task forces are eerily reminiscent of the secretive energy task force run by former Vice President Cheney,” the letter reads. “Simply put, it is unacceptable for federal agencies to operate in such a clandestine and unaccountable manner especially when the result could be the undoing of critical public health and safety protections.”

The lawmakers’ claims have been compared to similar complaints against Democratic administrations. Lauren Wright, a politics instructor at Princeton University who served on the White House Transition Project, noted in an interview on Thursday that the letter is reminiscent of Republican charges against Hillary Clinton in the early 1990s when she led a task force on reforming the American healthcare system. Her group fielded criticism and lawsuits concerning meeting secrecy and the appearance that special interests were dictating outcomes.