Expert Notes Gap in Human-Trafficking Laws as Senators Press for Fund Renewal
WASHINGTON – A bipartisan group of senators on Wednesday introduced a package of legislation meant to address human trafficking, which has grown into a high-profile issue in the past decade.
Introduced by Sens. John Cornyn (R-Texas), Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), the Abolish Human Trafficking Act would renew the Department of Justice’s Domestic Trafficking Victims’ Fund, which supplied $5 million in human-trafficking-victim services in 2016. The fund is financed through fines levied on convicted human traffickers and sexual predators. The legislation also supports several other research, law enforcement and advocacy efforts.
“Human trafficking is modern-day slavery, and one of the most pressing human rights issues of our time,” Cornyn said in a statement. “We have a solemn responsibility to support victims of human trafficking as they recover and to help law enforcement bring justice to the criminals who exploit them.”
While the lawmakers in their joint statement touted progress made from human-trafficking legislation passed in 2015, an expert on Thursday said that there is no empirical evidence suggesting that efforts to curtail human trafficking have been successful. In fact, there’s little reliable data on the matter in general, given the clandestine nature of the crimes.
Depending on the source, statistics show that there are anywhere from 100,000 to 300,000 child victims throughout the United States, and many of the statistics are based on proxy data like phone calls to victim hotlines.
Klobuchar, in the joint statement, noted that over the past year, the U.S. has seen a dramatic increase in the number of survivors calling the National Trafficking Hotline for assistance.
Kimberly Mehlman-Orozco, a human-trafficking specialist who has interviewed more than 2,000 victims and has served as an expert witness in criminal cases, on Thursday pointed to what she says is a massive gap between law on the books and law in practice. As human trafficking has developed into a more prominent issue, she said that the field has attracted opportunists posing as experts and looking to secure grant funding through programs like the Domestic Trafficking Victims’ Fund. One major issue, she said, is the lack of evaluation or follow-up for any of these programs.
“I think before we continue passing more and different legislation, we need to fill those gaps, and we need to reconcile those differences, so that the laws that we currently have are being implemented in the way we expect them to,” Mehlman-Orozco said.
She suggested third-party evaluations for victims’ services to judge the efficacy of the programs that receive federal funding. She reeled off a list of questions that need to be answered: When a group claims it has helped victims, how is that defined? Were the victims off the streets for six months, a year? Were they able to obtain gainful employment? Were they able to be reunited with family? Were they able to get erroneous charges dropped?