01-20-2019 01:01:48 PM -0800
01-20-2019 10:48:50 AM -0800
01-20-2019 07:24:01 AM -0800
01-19-2019 04:27:50 PM -0800
01-19-2019 11:09:10 AM -0800
It looks like you've previously blocked notifications. If you'd like to receive them, please update your browser permissions.
Desktop Notifications are  | 
Get instant alerts on your desktop.
Turn on desktop notifications?
Remind me later.
PJ Media encourages you to read our updated PRIVACY POLICY and COOKIE POLICY.

John Roberts and the Cloward-Piven Strategy

I don't think it's quite sunk in yet on the Right just how awful the John Roberts Obamacare decision really is, or what nasty consequences will now flow from it.

Of course, it's a betrayal on the part of the chief justice, not only of the conservative constituency that put him into his lifetime, very well paid sinecure, but of all Americans foolish enough to believe that we actually are a government of laws, not men. At one stroke, Roberts has damaged his own reputation (ruined it, really) and that of the court. If Roberts was reacting to the unconscionable and outrageous pressure being put on him by the president and his amen corner in the media -- as it appears he was -- then, as Chapman University law professor John Eastman has said, Roberts should resign:

If the assumption is right, that he thinks was unconstitutional but found a way to uphold it to preserve the integrity of the court, then he really ought to resign because it proves he doesn't have the judicial fortitude to do the job that he’s been chosen to do.

Of course, it's both a job-destroyer and a job non-creator. Beginning Thursday morning, all over America employers were looking at their work-force rosters, calculating the increased costs to them of Obamacare, governmental compliance, and dealing with the IRS, and mentally making their pink-slip lists. And what employer in his right mind, already battling the continuing Great Recession, is going to take on new employees at this point? Except the IRS. Because --

Of course it's a tax on the middle class -- not just one but more than twenty; even worse, it's a tax on inactivity; and worst of all, it's a tax effectively imposed by Roberts himself, since the government only obliquely tried to make that case while it tried to have it both ways in its Commerce Clause argument -- but Roberts obligingly helped them out. It also gives the IRS broad new powers, as if it didn't have enough already; the way things are headed, some day every single taxpayer (what few will remain as the beggaring of America by Washington continues) will have his or her own personal IRS agent, to keep tabs on their behavior -- both active and (thanks to Roberts) passive.

But the worst thing about the whole fiasco -- the law itself, the way it was passed, the dishonesty of its adherents and the court's wholesale abrogation of constitutional principles -- is that it is a direct assault on the citizens of the United States, and a blatant attempt by the forces of liberal fascism to turn us into subjects. Nancy Pelosi was serious when she asked, "Are you serious?" to an inquiry whether Obamacare was constitutional; at the time we took it as a joke. But now the joke's on us.