What Is Hillary Hiding?


Like millions of avid news readers, I’ve been trying to sort out the Hillary Clinton scandals.  You know, all that stuff about classified material on her “private” server, sensitive national security secrets that have most likely been lifted by hostiles.

I think we’ve lost track of the central question:  Why was she so eager to conceal her communications from Congress and the American public?  Most of the commentary goes something like “because she wanted to evade discovery.”  She dreaded all the FOIAs.  But that only leads to the question another time: What did she want to hide, and why?  Most of her policy decisions would be recorded elsewhere, and could be discovered.  Indeed, policy cables, memos and emails are excellent tools for deception and she could have used them for that purpose (Henry Kissinger advised me a long time ago that the only reason for writing a memo was to have it leaked, and he played that game brilliantly).

What if the concealment had to do with non-policy matters?  Or with policy issues linked to something else?  Money, for example.  Not U.S. government money, but private money that would enrich the Clintons themselves?

The most frightening explanation is that she sold foreign policy favors to the highest bidders to the Clinton Foundation and/or her husband.

Peter Schweizer, the author of Clinton Cash, argues that we can’t understand the “server” story unless we look carefully at the Clinton Foundation.  In his opinion, some of Hillary’s policy decisions were linked to contributions to the Clinton Foundation.  He calls our attention to the surprising fact that 20% of U.S. uranium is under the control of companies owned by Russia, and the Clinton Foundation pocketed roughly $150 million from the companies and advisers involved in the deals.