During the swearing-in ceremony of Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, President Donald Trump launched a scathing critique of the United States Postal Service (USPS), igniting a wave of panic among Democrats who predictably are always on the side of maintaining the status quo of inefficiency for the failing institution.
“We want to have a post office that works well and doesn’t lose massive amounts of money, and we’re thinking about doing that,” Trump declared.
Trump isn’t just spouting off; he's advocating for a merger that will streamline the USPS while keeping its core mission intact. He asserted, “I think it’ll operate a lot better than it has been over the years,” which shouldn’t come as a surprise to anyone who has ever had to deal with the absurd inefficiencies ingrained in the USPS system.
The Postal Service is, as Trump said, a “tremendous loser" for this country, racking up financial losses year after year that seem to defy logic. The USPS lost $9.5 billion during FY2024.
Inefficiency is part of the USPS brand, essentially embedded in our popular culture. A classic example is the “Seinfeld” character Newman, the disgruntled postal worker. With his lazy antics and lackluster work ethic, Newman perfectly encapsulates the frustrations many Americans feel about the Postal Service, which he commonly referenced during his appearances on the show.
However, despite the USPS having this well-earned reputation of dysfunction and inefficiency, Democrats aren’t open to doing anything about it. Following Trump's comments, Democrat members of the House Oversight Committee urged Trump to abandon any plans that could “threaten” the USPS’s independence, whining that such reforms could “directly undermine the affordability and reliability of the U.S. postal system,” Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.), the ranking Democrat on the committee, wrote in a letter.
Isn’t that rich? The same party that consistently supports wasteful spending and bloated government programs is now playing the advocate for a postal service riddled with inefficiency like it’s a sacred cow that cannot and should not be touched.
“Congress prescribed a clear and critical mandate for the Postal Service: to deliver efficient, reliable, and universal service to all Americans,” Connelly’s letter argued as if the current state of affairs somehow lives up to that mandate. It’s laughable given the USPS’s staggering $100 billion in losses over the past decade. Outdated practices and lack of accountability often hamper the agency's ability to deliver essential mail, from life-saving medications to important financial documents.
Recommended: Who Will Lead the Post-Trump GOP?
Democrats really don’t get it, do they? They’d rather protect an inefficient system rather than allow for necessary reforms that could modernize the agency and improve service quality for all Americans.
In the wake of Postmaster General Louis DeJoy’s resignation, the uncertainty surrounding the USPS's future has only intensified. But Democrats are doubling down on their defense of an outdated system rather than embracing Trump's call for change. They’d rather cling to inefficiency than confront the reality that the USPS, as it stands, is in dire need of reform. If Democrats spent half as much energy advocating for effective government as they do protecting failure, perhaps we could have a postal service that serves the people it was intended to help.
Trump's pragmatic approach shouldn’t send shockwaves through Washington; it should be met with welcome arms. Let’s hope he can navigate the bureaucratic maze and provide a path toward a more efficient and effective postal service because what we have now isn’t working.
