A symposium backed by the Obama administration and the UN on “countering violent extremism” (CVE), being held today at the Ronald Reagan Building in Washington, D.C., inadvertently exposes the farce of the administration’s CVE policies.
Multiple reports in recent weeks have documented how local CVE programs — launched by the administration in February 2015 at the White House Summit on Countering Violent Extremism — in Boston, Los Angeles, and Minneapolis are failing miserably. The programs are now openly opposed by the very same groups targeted by CVE programs and that demanded them in the first place.
A look at today’s “CVE Symposium” exposes why those efforts are failing. One of the keynote speakers today was DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson:
At the #CVEsymposium, Sec Johnson spoke on our efforts to engage communities in our homeland security mission pic.twitter.com/cf22ikiVhs
— Homeland Security (@DHSgov) April 6, 2016
Countering Violent Extremism Key to DHS Mission, Johnson Says $ https://t.co/XDnj0KJyFi via @relucasz
— CQ Now (@CQnow) April 6, 2016
Johnson’s remarks make clear that the administration’s CVE programs are not unfairly targeting the Muslim community. He also identified the real culprit spreading violent extremism — GOP presidential candidates:
Johnson acknowledged that the government’s CVE efforts have focused on Muslim communities, but he pushed back against the idea that it zeroes in on the Islamic faith.
“Many people ask me, ‘Are you targeting Muslims? Why are you targeting Muslims?’” he said. “We’re not targeting a religion or even a specific group. We have a generic mission.”
But, he said, CVE efforts have focused on American Muslim communities because the Islamic State, which he called “probably the most dangerous terrorist organization that we face right now,” is targeting American Muslims.
“So we must respond in counter to that effort, as a matter of homeland security,” Johnson said.
The secretary also pushed back against “overheated rhetoric” on the Republican presidential campaign trail about banning Muslims from entering the United States or increasing police patrols and surveillance in Muslim communities.
“There is no one American Muslim community, contrary to some of the political dialogue you may hear,” he said. “There is not one neighborhood or ghetto or city that one could encircle or surveil.”
Also addressing the CVE symposium was UN General Secretary Ban Ki-moon. He promised to take action on CVE:
Via video, UN Sec Ban Ki-moon states #CVESymposium UN may introduce in June resolution to combat CVE. @1977Creative pic.twitter.com/fdgvAcl7J2
— Pablo Maldonado (@pablomtweets) April 6, 2016
A concurrent CVE event was being held in Geneva:
An excellent start to today’s dialogue at the GCSP on preventing and countering violent extremism #PVE #CVE pic.twitter.com/RVQ2zVzXqc — GCSP (@TheGCSP) April 6, 2016
Back at the symposium in D.C., nothing says “countering violent extremism” like a lecture from the Saudi (!) ambassador, who swore there is no such thing as Wahhabism:
Amb Al-Saud: “Violent extremism isn’t always religious” #CVEsymposiumpic.twitter.com/WQ9xt14H7u
— Saudi Embassy (@SaudiEmbassyUSA) April 6, 2016
Amb Al-Saud: “There’s no such thing as Wahhabism” #CVEsymposium
— Saudi Embassy (@SaudiEmbassyUSA) April 6, 2016
Some of the helpful insights from the CVE Symposium speakers came from a panel that declared U.S. laws banning terrorist organizations hinder CVE efforts:
US Patriotic Act ban on terrorist groups is a challenge for doing effective reintegration work with defectors of ISIS #CVESymposium @SFCG_
— CIT (@CitMediates) April 6, 2016
#CVESymposium #reintegration panel cites challenge US Patriotic Act & other countries’ laws pose to work on #CVE by civil society.
— WASL (@WASL_link) April 6, 2016
Former White House director for community engagement George Selim, now at DHS, let slip how much a farce “countering violent extremism” really is by admitting CVE was just a term used by the D.C. “smart set” inside the Beltway:
George Selim Direc Comm Partnerships @DHSgov says the term countering violent extremism #CVE limited to #DC beltway pic.twitter.com/aEfoJl3qI1 — Kamran Bokhari (@KamranBokhari) April 6, 2016
Homeland’s G. Salim #CVESymposium: “we’re not going to arrest our way out of this problem.”Heads Comm. Partnerships. pic.twitter.com/9rOMtNOUwi — Pablo Maldonado (@pablomtweets) April 6, 2016
No D.C. “smart set” event would be complete without the “my politically correct grievance-mongering is more equal than yours” back-and-forth:
.@USAID‘s Allison Salyer: We have moved beyond gender blind approaches but can do more. #women #cve #CVESymposium @CVEcommunity
— IPSI (@IPSInstitute) April 6, 2016
Male moderator mansplaining CVE to female panelist on Women in CVE panel. Rich. #CVESymposium
— Caitlin Turner (@trneroundthwrld) April 6, 2016
@Bobby_McKenzie with the first mention of #LGBT communities in the relation to #CVE, how can we link them more substantively? #CVESymposium — Robert Lord (@RobALord) April 6, 2016
Just by acknowledging when we talk about CVE, we talk about Muslims doesn’t make it okay. We’re still not changing the convo. #CVESymposium — Shafaq (@shaffiiii) April 6, 2016
“Grinds my gears” that association between #mentalillness and #violence is so close as to be rhetorically inseparable. #CVESymposium
— Bethany L. (@blmcgann) April 6, 2016
The “experts” knew exactly who CVE needs to target — right wingers:
Far Right Extremism needs inclusion in CVE initiatives #CVESymposium@BraniffBill@START_UMD — Rik Kirchner (@RikKirchner) April 6, 2016
Also, the “extremist violence of western foreign policy,” courtesy of this George Washington University prof:
“Focusing on the radicalisation of young Muslims obfuscates the extremist violence of western foreign policy” https://t.co/bezxO0qUyB
— William Lafi Youmans (@wyoumans) April 5, 2016
The Obama administration’s CVE efforts began in spring 2010 when the DHS CVE Working Group published their recommendation. Among those participating in the DHS task force were Obama Muslim outreach allies Dalia Mogahed, Mohamed Magid, and Mohamed Elibiary.
But the CVE efforts began in earnest in 2012, when U.S. Muslim groups demanded a “purge” of counter-terrorism trainers and curriculum. The White House quickly responded with a widespread “purge” across all federal agencies.
So it is remarkable that the loudest voices condemning the Obama administration’s CVE programs, including the Soros-funded Article 19 and Charity and Security Network, are the same Muslim groups, academics, and far Left activists who demanded it in the first place:
Need to remove law enforcement from #cve. Youth and Muslims know it’s about them being watched. #CVESymposium https://t.co/9dc0K4gz6B
— Charity & Security (@CharitySecurity) April 6, 2016
CVE is being mainstreamed globally through the #UN, endangering human rights + #FreeSpeech worldwide https://t.co/O93NTOwi7V #CVESymposium
— ARTICLE 19 UN (@article19UN) April 6, 2016
DHS and US attys may think they’re making progress with #CVE, but target communities disagree: https://t.co/sv9vX13nRP — Faiza Patel (@FaizaPatelBCJ) March 28, 2016
Just yesterday, Muslim activists in Minneapolis — one of three cities where the White House launched local CVE programs — held a press conference to denounce the Obama administration’s CVE efforts:
A diverse group of leaders representing civil rights and religious organizations Tuesday called on Minnesotans to… https://t.co/POOlYEOAbb — CAIR MN (@CAIRMN) April 6, 2016
At a press conference today, #CVE was compared to COINTELPRO. Just going to let that sink in for a bit @mukhtaryare https://t.co/WjUFlamI3j — Seamus Hughes (@SeamusHughes) April 6, 2016
Another city with serious radicalization problems, Boston — also hosting a local White House CVE program — is facing a pushback by Muslim organizations:
#Obama is testing his “Countering Violent Extremism” program in #Boston. Guess whom he is facing resistance from? https://t.co/gMIQz3ttQs
— Nina Rosenwald (@ninarosenwald) April 5, 2016
It’s no surprise then that these Obama administration CVE programs are so far an abysmal failure:
A feature, not a bug, of #CVE ==> Effort in 3 US cities to combat extremism off to slow start https://t.co/01wpENvfGZ — Patrick Poole (@pspoole) March 24, 2016
Federally Funded Effort To Fight Terrorist Recruitment In Boston Off To Slow Start https://t.co/qLlekmm5Rn via @cbsboston #CVE
— Nicholas A. Glavin (@nickglavin) March 24, 2016
How big a failure are the Obama CVE programs? Their supporters now have to resort to the “even if they don’t work, they’re still helpful” excuse:
Whether It Works Or Not, U.S. Anti-Radicalization Plan Can Benefit Communities https://t.co/Xn34FdLc4N
— NPR Popular (@nprpopular) April 3, 2016
Finally, the organizers of today’s CVE symposium had the perfect prescription for event participants to handle the farce that Obama’s highly touted CVE programs have predictably become — happy hour:
In a few min. join #CVESymposium participants to continue today’s conversations over #happyhour specials at 1331 Bar & Lounge. — CVE Community (@CVEcommunity) April 6, 2016
And of course, a plea for the snake oil that cures all D.C. CVE “smart set” ills — more government money:
@BraniffBill “If really serious about solving problem, have to fund things that sound boring, like data.” Yes. #CVESymposium
— Caitlin Turner (@trneroundthwrld) April 6, 2016
Join the conversation as a VIP Member