A “transgender” teacher in Virginia encouraged violence online to promote preferred pronouns. Ironically, it was at almost the same time that an appeals court ruled in favor of free speech and against forcing students to use preferred pronouns.
What we are witnessing in our country now is not merely a struggle between two political parties, but quite literally a struggle between those who uphold reality and those who not only deny reality but try to reshape it in their warped image. It is a battle of truth versus lies, sanity versus insanity, and goodness versus perversion.
The 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Olentangy Local School District in Ohio cannot enforce its preferred pronouns policy on students, a win for free speech. The policy was supposedly “anti-harassment,” but in actuality, it demanded that students affirm mental illness by using invented pronouns.
Defending Education filed the lawsuit, deeming the school district policy unconstitutional. The group’s Vice President, Sarah Parshall Perry, celebrated the ruling on X as a First Amendment victory because “students do not shed their speech rights at the schoolhouse gate. And no, schools cannot force children to pick a side on gender identity & speak accordingly.”
Related: Disturbing: U.S. Needed SCOTUS to Affirm Passports Can Use Only Biological Sex
The ruling comes as Danville Public Schools in Virginia temporarily suspended teacher “Sabrina” Morris, a man who pretends to be a woman and, for some reason, is allowed around kids every day, for a social media post apparently threatening to shoot people who didn’t want to use preferred pronouns:
🚨 TRANS TEACHER THREATENING VIOLENCE TO PUSH WOKE AGENDA
— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) November 5, 2025
Sabrina Morris, a man pretending to be a woman, is a teacher at Danville Public Schools in Virginia. He made a post online threatening to SHOOT people if they don't put made-up pronouns into emails.
Would you feel… pic.twitter.com/OjOEmwD9Nu
Sounds to me as if a firing is in order. Morris clearly isn’t mentally stable and shouldn’t be around kids unsupervised.
The timing of the two events is not striking because they are directly related, but simply because they are so illustrative of the two sides in the culture war. We could come up with endless other examples, such as the new court victory against children at drag shows in Texas, but the point remains the same.
🚨 BREAKING: Appeals court upholds Texas drag show ban law. This ruling is a MASSIVE WIN for sanity and safety!
— Gays Against Groomers (@againstgrmrs) November 7, 2025
Groomers in Texas who think rainbow flags give them a free pass to sexualize minors hardest hit.
We love to see it! 👏 pic.twitter.com/nCobZQAKFn
We cannot afford to pretend that we can coexist forever with these crazy people. This is, of course, not a call to violence but a call to enthusiastic prosecution of the culture war through political, societal, legal, and religious action. These two new court victories illustrate that it is possible to defeat institutional attempts at enforcing radical ideologies.
Republicans learned a hard lesson this week with the election, which revealed that Democrats are more committed than ever to their destructive ideology. The question is whether or not we are willing to oppose them with the same commitment and determination.
