'Post Birth Abortion' Advocated

Under the guise of “potential persons.”

Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva, associated respectively with Monash University, in Melbourne, Australia, and with the Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, in the UK, wrote a piece called “After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?”

Abortion is largely accepted even for reasons that do not have anything to do with the fetus’ health. By showing that (1) both fetuses and newborns do not have the same moral status as actual persons, (2) the fact that both are potential persons is morally irrelevant and (3) adoption is not always in the best interest of actual people, the authors argue that what we call ‘after-birth abortion’ (killing a newborn) should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is, including cases where the newborn is not disabled.

Ethical slopes do get awfully slippery. And slippery they are right now, with an American president in office who has voted in favor of infanticide, leading a party that has sold its soul for the Margaret Sanger sacrament.


Trending on PJ Media Videos

Join the conversation as a VIP Member