PJTV: Mind reading 101

a onblur=”try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}” href=”http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_6XsGr86A1rs/S2dprTedGEI/AAAAAAAAAJw/3lcfJ1RqZ7A/s1600-h/brainscan.aspx”img style=”float:right; margin:0 0 10px 10px;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 178px;” src=”http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_6XsGr86A1rs/S2dprTedGEI/AAAAAAAAAJw/3lcfJ1RqZ7A/s320/brainscan.aspx” border=”0″ alt=””id=”BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5433427668129093698″ //abr /Is science advanced to the point where a jury could decide a man’s guilt through mind reading? What if reading a defendant’s memory could betray their guilt? Can we determine the guilt or innocence of a terrorist just by scanning his brain?br /br /Glenn and I talk to Professor Walter Sinnott-Armstrong about the legal and psychological aspects of the new science of a href=”http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/node/49520″Neurolaw./a Is it ethical? Should the government have the power to use magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to “read people’s minds”? Does it really work? Find out.br /br /a href=”http://www.pjtv.com/video/Instapundit/Tech%2C_Lies%2C_%26_Videotape%3A_Will_Neuroscience_Become_Our_Judge%2C_Jury%2C_%26_Executioner%3F_/3019/”You can watch the show here./a