I was reading a href=”http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28191199/?GT1=43001″an article today /aabout a fifty-year-old man who was fed up with teens toilet-papering his house, and decided to take matters into his own hands:br /br /blockquoteA 50-year-old man who told authorities he was fed up with teens toilet-papering his house decided to defend his property — with a squirt gun filled with fox urine. br /br /Now, Scott Wagar is in trouble with the law….br /br /According to police, Wagar was on his property Sept. 16 when he used night vision goggles to see 15-20 people running toward his place. He told police that he told them to leave, swore at them and sprayed them with the fox urine. He also allegedly struggled with one of the teens./blockquotebr /br /It seems to me someone really trying to defend their property would have more than fox urine. If he really struggled with one of the teens, perhaps this should be looked into. However, if this man is in trouble, shouldn’t the teens who were trespassing and proceeding to cause problems to his property also be in trouble with the law?