At the recent House Oversight Committee’s Task Force on the Declassification of Federal Secrets hearing concerning the CIA’s notorious, yet still almost totally unaudited, Cold War-era mind control program, MK-ULTRA, which may or may not be continuing today under a new regime, not a single Democrat on the committee bothered to even show up.
Which probably says a lot about their position on Deep State mind control ops.
Democrats fall heavily into the “pro” column on the question of covert government mind control.
Obviously.
We all lived through COVID.
Related: Canadian Government Pushes Psychiatric Medication for 'Vaccine-Hesitant'
Beyond not bothering to show up, though, the Democrats also selected as their “expert witness” a woman called Elizabeth Ginexi — an “expert” with, by her own admission, no expertise whatsoever on MK-ULTRA or anything ostensibly to do with governmental psychological warfare at all.
Instead, Ginexi is a retired NIH bureaucrat with, according to her bio, an “expertise in family and community-based etiology, prevention, and treatment research; clinical trials.”
Accordingly, she spent her entire opening statement belly-aching about the Trump administration’s cuts to NIH funding, whereas in a sane world she would just be eternally grateful that every single senior official in the Public Health™ apparatus who inflicted COVID on the country isn’t rotting in prison at this very moment, which is where they all belong.
Related: Ousted Director Francis Collins Demands Americans Pay ‘Utmost Respect’ to NIH
Via Washington Examiner (emphasis added):
Democrats boycotted the hearing, though they sent Ginexi presumably to signal their belief that it was a political distraction. Democrats were able to call Ginexi to testify under the House’s minority witness rule.
Ginexi’s prepared statement spanned 56 pages. Chairwoman Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL) cut her oral remarks off after five minutes, however, per the committee’s rules. Luna had previously told the three witnesses that she would “not be gaveling [them] out” if they exceeded five minutes.
“Obviously this is supposed to be a hearing about MKUltra, but when you gave your opening statement — and I don’t even know why you were called to this hearing because you didn’t offer anything about MKUltra — but since you are here and you are going to defend NIH, I am going to call you out on it,” Rep. Eli Crane (R-AZ) said after an uncomfortable round of questions aimed at Ginexi.
After the room erupted in applause, Crane accused Ginexi of being “pretty tone deaf to what the public thinks about how the NIH handled COVID.”
Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) dug into Ginexi about Dr. Anthony Fauci and alleged side effects of the COVID-19 vaccine. After Ginexi conceded that she is “not an MKUltra expert,” Mace looked her in the eye and asked, “Why did the Dems send you here?”
At one point, Rep. Tim Burchett (R-TN), who walked into the hearing late, offered for Binexi to “jump in” and answer a question. Another committee member chimed in, “She is with NIH,” at which point Burchett reversed his offer.
Related: Chelsea Clinton Launches Anti-MAHA Podcast
Did you know?
The army had a special classified sister program to complement the CIA’s MK-ULTRA, codenamed MK-NAOMI.
And where was MK-NAOMI housed?
That would be Fort Detrick in Maryland — precisely the facility that the NIH used years later to conduct gain-of-function on coronaviruses before such research was proscribed in 2014 and Fauci was forced to offshore that exact same research to…. the Wuhan Institute of Virology!
Related: Bill Gates Lobbying White House to Reverse USAID Cuts: Report
Via Alliance for Human Research Protection (emphasis added):
Beginning in 1952, both the CIA and Fort Detrick’s Special Operations Division (SOD) had formalized a written 2-year $1,000,000 contract with the NYS Psychiatric Institute (1952–53). It was officially referred to as Project MK-NAOMI, an adjunct to the larger CIA behavior modification projects (ARTICHOKE) and MK-ULTRA. As stated in a Top Secret CIA memorandum dated January 1954 that was uncovered forty-six years later (in 2000) by “cold case” prosecutors in the NYC Attorney General’s office. The memo provides detailed information about contractual relationships, including the fact that the SOD contract with the NYSPI was established for the exclusive purposes of devising biological weapons that could be targeted at “individuals for the purposes of affecting human behavior with the objectives ranging from very temporary minor disablement to more serious and longer incapacitation to death.”
