They — and by “they,” I mean the technocratic elite that includes The Atlantic, arguably as the mouthpiece of The Beast — gaslit the public valiantly regarding COVID for going on five years now.
They kicked thousands of people, maybe even approaching a million, including me, off various social media platforms permanently. The Twitter Files, which we only have because Elon Musk bought Twitter, prove the government took, illegally, an active hand in the mass censorship scheme.
They intimidated.
They threatened.
They shamed.
They revoked medical licenses.
They killed research into alternative therapeutics and made up stories about gunshot victims in Oklahoma dying in the waiting room as scores of Deplorables overdose on “horse dewormer” ivermectin — which, incidentally, is one of the safest medications in the world on the WHO list of essential medicines.
Related: Study: COVID Shots Cripple Immune System — Possibly Permanently
They accused anyone asking legitimate questions of killing people.
The (alleged) president of the United States, the Biden entity, declared in 2021 behind the presidential seal that his “patience is wearing thin” with Americans who resisted the cajoling to get injected.
All of that considered, the recent headline from The Atlantic strikes a discordant note: “Yes, Some Children May Have Died From COVID Shots.” It’s especially off-brand compared to a cornucopia of other articles covering COVID over the last half-decade, like its June 2022 article titled “Don’t Wait to Get Your Kid Vaccinated.”
Related: In 2025, WebMD Claims COVID Vax ‘Still Crucial for Children’
Why the sudden pivot from “safe and effective” as a religious mantra to “okay, we killed a few kids; make an omelet, break a few eggs, know what I mean?”
My guess is that they fear more truth coming out of the RFK Jr.-controlled public health apparatus.
In highly related news, on the other side of the Atlantic (no pun intended), the British authorities are currently refusing to allow the public to see evidence it has of the devastating effects of the COVID shots, arguing that allowing their subjects to know what the government knows — information it collected using public money, under the authority ostensibly granted to it by the people in what is alleged to be a democracy — would undermine the vaccine agenda.
Via the Telegraph (emphasis added):
The public health watchdog has been accused of a “cover-up” after refusing to publish data that could link the Covid vaccine to excess deaths.
The UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) argued that releasing the data would lead to the “distress” of bereaved relatives if a link were to be discovered.
Public health officials also argued that publishing the data risked damaging the well-being and mental health of the families and friends of people who died.
Last year, a cross-party group expressed alarm about “growing public and professional concerns” over the UK’s rates of excess deaths since 2020.
In a letter to UKHSA and Department for Health, the MPs and peers said that potentially critical data – which map the date of people’s Covid vaccine doses to the date of their deaths – had been released to pharmaceutical companies but not put into the public domain.
They argued that the data should be released “on the same anonymised basis that it was shared with the pharmaceutical groups, and there seems to be no credible reason why that should not be done immediately”.
UsForThem, a campaign group, requested that UKHSA release the data under freedom of information laws. But the agency refused, making a number of different arguments including that publishing the data “could lead to misinformation” that would “have an adverse impact on vaccine uptake” in the public.
