Premium

Adventures in The Patriarchy™: ‘Not Yet a Human’

Anja Niedringhaus

Chronicling the ongoing intersectional struggle to liberate women — inclusively defined as the legacy kind and the transgenders — from The Patriarchy™, one microaggression at a time.

Obese liberal woman throws herself a lonely party ahead of self-sterilization

She even made herself a cake that said “Bye Bye Tubes!”

Tomorrow I’m getting permanently sterilized by having my fallopian tubes removed. So I decided to throw a little celebration for that and to celebrate the fact that I’ve made the choice to not have kids. Women tend to only be celebrated when they get engaged, get married or have a baby. And it’s rare to see them celebrated as individuals for their accomplishments outside of their family. So it was really important to me to make sure that I dedicated time and space to celebrate myself and this life-changing decision that I’m making.

Wow!

First of all, it’s not at all difficult to imagine women “being celebrated for accomplishments outside of their family.” Literally turn on any legacy media outlet and, chances are, they’re celebrating some new tech CEO girlboss at this very moment.

Second, getting yourself fixed is not in any sense an accomplishment.

Third, is no liberal woman capable of “celebrating herself” without making a TikTok video about her “celebrating herself” and all of her wondrous “accomplishments”?

Imagining something more dystopian than this sad display of narcissism is certainly possible, but it’d give any Hunger Games scene a run for its money.

Related: HuffPo Feminist Quits Shaving to Protest for Abortion Rights

Visibly pregnant feminist turns up at abortion protest with ‘not yet a human’ scrawled on belly

The internet remembers everything.

Imagine what that kid is going to feel once he grows up, to see his mother call him “not a human.”

Related: NPR Releases Hardcore Abortion Porn Audio to Savor on Your Morning Commute

Australian regime media demands every industry be ‘gender-balanced’

Via The Conversation (emphasis added):

Australia’s workforce is almost evenly split between men and women. Yet fewer than one in four Australians work in a gender-balanced occupation.

This has improved over time, but at a glacial rate. In 1990, more than half of men (52%) worked in occupations that were more than 80% male. Thirty-five years on, that figure has only declined to 41% of men.

Meanwhile, the share of women in female-dominated occupations (which are more than 60% female) has largely hovered between 60% to 65% since the mid-1990s…

Income per person is lower when women are under-represented in entrepreneurial positions and in highly-skilled occupations*.

From scientific teams to company boards, international research shows innovation is higher in gender-diverse teams.

Segregation also contributes to the gender pay gap and inequality.

*Note that feminists never demand that blue-collar vocations like “construction worker” ever be forcibly gender-balanced through social engineering; it’s always executive boards and airline pilots. Isn’t that weird?

The article includes a graph of the “gender imbalance” in various industries.

The most gender-imbalanced industry is mining.

Curiously, I looked very thoroughly yet couldn’t find any call in the article to send more women down the mineshafts; they seemed to focus on CEO roles.

They seem more interested in the kinds of careers they can mine TikTok content out of for attention.

Anyway, all of this talk about the gender binary strikes me as remarkably transphobic.

What is a woman?

How does one define “gender balance” if “woman” is just a social construct of The Patriarchy™?

I scoured the article, and there’s no mention of what the tranny quota for various industries ought to be.

Shame on The Conversation; they ought to have their social media privileges revoked for hate speech.

Recommended

Trending on PJ Media Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement