The recent Mexico bird flu hoax, in which the WHO appendage that has burrowed itself in that nation’s bureaucracy allegedly discovered the world’s first human case of bird flu, perfectly illustrates how the WHO hijacks the sovereignty of the state through insidious bureaucratic maneuvering, which leaves the nations subject to its rule in a state of defenseless against its edicts.
Related: Croatian MEP: Time to Declare WHO a Terrorist Organization
Via World Health Organization (emphasis added):
On 23 May 2024, the Mexico IHR NFP reported to PAHO/WHO a confirmed case of human infection with avian influenza A(H5N2) virus detected in a 59-year-old resident of the State of Mexico who was hospitalized in Mexico City and had no history of exposure to poultry or other animals. The case had multiple underlying medical conditions. The case’s relatives reported that the case had already been bedridden for three weeks, for other reasons, prior to the onset of acute symptoms.
On 17 April, the case developed fever, shortness of breath, diarrhoea, nausea and general malaise. On 24 April, the case sought medical attention, was hospitalized at the National Institute of Respiratory Diseases “Ismael Cosio Villegas” (INER per its acronym in Spanish) and died the same day due to complications of his condition.
Results from Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) of a respiratory sample collected and tested at INER on 24 April indicated a non-subtypeable influenza A virus. On 8 May, the sample was sent for sequencing to the Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Emerging Diseases Center for Research in Infectious Diseases (CIENI per its acronym in Spanish) of INER, which indicated that the sample was positive for influenza A(H5N2). On 20 May, the sample was received at the Institute of Epidemiological Diagnosis and Reference (InDRE per its acronym in Spanish) of the Mexico National Influenza Centre, for analysis by RT-PCR, obtaining a positive result for influenza A. On 22 May, sequencing of the sample confirmed the influenza subtype was A(H5N2).
In fact, it is neither true that the Mexican gentleman the WHO is now claiming died from bird flu actually died from bird flu nor that PCR testing is accurate for diagnosing active viral infections — a purpose it was never used for, despite being around for decades, before it was repurposed to underpin COVID-19 terror propaganda.
Related: In Light of Bird Flu Terror, Let’s Revisit the PCR Scam
Buried deep in its report, the WHO tacitly acknowledges that the Mexican PCR death was a total lie that collapses on cursory examination.
Continuing via WHO, to emphasize:
On 23 May 2024, the Mexico IHR NFP* reported to PAHO/WHO a confirmed case of human infection with avian influenza A(H5N2) virus detected in a 59-year-old resident of the State of Mexico who was hospitalized in Mexico City and had no history of exposure to poultry or other animals. The case had multiple underlying medical conditions. The case’s relatives reported that the case had already been bedridden for three weeks, for other reasons, prior to the onset of acute symptoms.
*Here is the critical point to hammer home: the initial report of the Mexican human bird flu case, before it entered the corporate state media news cycle for wall-to-wall propaganda dissemination, came from the National IHR Focal Point (NFP) in Mexico — a creation of the WHO, run according to WHO mandate — that implements the WHO’s International Health Regulations (IHR), a legally binding set of regulations enforced on the many signatories to the original 1969 agreement, which was re-upped in 2005.
Via Wikipedia:
The International Health Regulations (IHR), first adopted by the World Health Assembly in 1969 and last revised in 2005, are a [sic] legally binding rules that only apply to the WHO that is an instrument that aims for international collaboration "to prevent, protect against, control, and provide a public health response to the international spread of disease in ways that are commensurate with and restricted to public health risks and that avoid unnecessary interference with international traffic and trade". The IHR is the only international legal treaty with the responsibility of empowering the World Health Organization (WHO) to act as the main global surveillance system.
Via WHO (emphasis added):
The National IHR Focal Points (NFPs) are critical to the implementation of the IHR as they conduct the communications aspects of the IHR, both within countries and internationally. A functioning NFP network is therefore key to the successful implementation of the IHR by WHO and the 196 States Parties that have agreed to be bound by them. As the designated point of contact between WHO and States Parties it is essential that NFPs are provided with the necessary authority, capacity, training and resources to effectively carry out their functions required of them by the IHR.
Under the IHR, each State Party is required to designate or establish a NFP, a national office or center (not individual person) that is accessible at all times for IHR-related communications with WHO and relevant sectors within the country. States Parties may have varying perspectives concerning the specific roles for their NFPs and the appropriate positioning of the NFP within the national governmental structure. Given the differences in these structures and roles, some variation in practice is inevitable regarding the implementation of related obligations under the IHR. At the same time, a level of global standardization is required for the global network of NFPs to operate effectively.
“Global standardization,” “accessible at all times,” “necessary authority” — these are the terms describing an entity beyond the control of the nation-state to reign in, and so by design.
