September 6, 2011 - 3:59 pm
In case you’re wondering, yes, the game is real. Several of the zombie figures in this video game are currently running for president. The incitement against them, against Fox and against the Koch brothers is tough to miss. It strikes me as the modern equivalent of the propaganda hate films used to smear the Jews back in 1930s Europe. It’s over the stop stupidity that prepares the culture for action to follow. It also begs a question: Are liberals who stir up such hate against conservatives responsible for garbage like this?
Where are the New Civility Police to condemn this?
Mr. Carney?
Mr. Biden?
Mr. Obama?
Mr. Reid?
Mrs. Pelosi?
Bueller? Bueller? Bueller?
Speaking of Mr. Oda, Media Research Center got in touch with him:
According to MRC, amongst the clients of this ad agency are Pepsi (no surprise there, given their Obama-worship), Meow Mix, Hotels.com, and TLC. Keep that in mind next time you encounter any of their products.
Given Pepsi’s new (2008) logo, we call it Obamacola.
The Website makes it appear like this company specializes in making games for advertising purposes. Wonder how those advertisers feel about their games appearing on the same company’s Website along with “Tea Party Zombies Must Die!!”
I don’t want to hear another fecking word about “new civility” or “new tone”.
It’s hard to think of a better example of projection than the behavior of the New Class left.
– order 20 pizzas,without anchovies?
No anchovies? You fiend!
Don’t post people’s personal information here. That’s grounds for banning.
That info is legitimate, public domain information. *HE* entered it online himself when he registered his domain. Don’t be a wuss.
I did nothing wrong.
Not wise to argue with the editors. I speak as one who has.
A word to the wise is sufficient.
And you obviously haven’t been banned, just warned.
Your forum, your rules. I defer.
Then post it somewhere else; it’s not welcome here.
Butt out, Chuck.
I’d be careful… Charles–besides being a friend and an all-around good guy–is a former editor who still has Roger’s private email address, as well as those of most of the other brass here.
Let’s make it easier… just try to be more polite, except to the obvious trolls. You’d be surprised how many people have contacts with the higher-ups around here… like me, having the private emails of several authors and editors, despite being a humble commenter.
I love the smell of ignorance in the morning.
Are liberals who stir up such hate against conservatives responsible for garbage like this?
Yes, because it is a calculated stirring up to achieve power. The left is the left, corrupt and immoral to the core.
ConservativeWanderer – I am polite, and I have been polite.
Let me suggest that you and Chuck take your own advice: Mind your own business.
But your warning to avoid angering the “elite” on this board is an interesting one. I will have to take that into consideration before commenting in the future.
You consider “Butt out, Chuck,” to be polite?
Well, I guess that explains a lot.
It is as polite as some (like you) jamming their proboscis in where it is neither requested nor welcome. I give what I get. Politeness is a two way street, unless you’re a libtard.
*Now* it explains a lot.
Please point out where, in this public forum, I have been impolite to you up to this point?
I stress the word public because by posting here, you invite comments from anyone and everyone. I’ve been blogging and commenting for years and never–never–called someone impolite for responding to what I say. Personally, that’s the whole idea… to get responses, to create a dialogue, a discussion, and occasionally, a debate.
Now, if one is seeking only a certain type of response, like a certain prominent politician, well, then this probably isn’t the best place to hang around unless you develop a thicker skin.
I didn’t refer to you as impolite; it was you who suggested that I try to be more polite. Charles was impolite, you jumped in and defended him. Then he was rude again. You are judged by the company you keep.
I have not been impolite to you directly.
I do find your attempt to copy my post by implying liberal traits to be amusing, though. Don’t worry, my skin is plenty thick, I have almost nothing in common with Obama, beyond our shared humanity.
For a game plotting the assassination of the current Democratic president, google “Obama’s Coup Fails”.
For a game letting you assassinate an older Democratic president, google “JFK Reloaded”.
For a game letting Democratic and Republican politicians (and Fidel Castro) fight and die against zombies, see the Call of Duty: Black Ops zombie multiplayer.
Etc. etc. etc. ad infinitum ad nauseum.
Seriously, you right-wingers act as if nothing like this ever happened before.
@Dolomite
Really? 60 years ago when Blacks were conservatives they had a 90% legitimacy rate and a high school graduation rate that paralleled other races. After 60 years of liberal indoctrination and lies they have a near 90% illegitimacy rate and a laughable graduation rate. The worst ghettos in America are in cities that have been run by liberals for decades. Which party supports abortion? You know, the genocidal practice in which black women make up a shockingly disproportionate number of. Since Roe v Wade, more black babies in the united states have been aborted than have been born. Please tell me again. which group is trying to kill poor blacks?
@Charlie – you wrote:
“Charlie Martin
I love the smell of ignorance in the morning.”
But you shower anyway, right?
There’s that whole politeness thing again.
You’re heading for a ban, and I won’t shed a tear when it happens.
Yes, and you’ll notice that once again, it was not directed at you. You have been polite so far, and I’ll remain polite in my discussions with you.
I’m heading for a ban, you say? For what cause, other than being impolite to one of the elite? In my defense, I would point out that he has been rude to me first on each occasion, and I have merely responded in kind. I think banning me for defending myself is inappropriate.
Unless you’re applying one of those “double standards” I’ve heard so much about; e.g., Chuck is one of the chosen few who can be rude at will, but if you defend yourself against his unwelcome unsolicited intrusions, you face banning.
Actually, the rules are, you get treated as politely as you treat others.
You’ve been nothing but rude since your mistake was pointed out–bruised ego there, perchance?–and so you get rudeness back.
Now, why don’t you leave all us hypocrites and rude people to our own amusements while you go find someplace “superior” to hang out… like LGF?
Yes, AAMOF, I did feel a little guilty after posting that info, but consoled myself by reminding myself that 1.) He would not hesitate if the tables were turned, and 2.) I got reprimanded. That is why I used a different pseudonym for this.
You wrote: “Actually, the rules are, you get treated as politely as you treat others.” Which is exactly what I said my own policy is. You have been relatively polite, despite some snarkyness. That is what *you* have gotten back from me. Charles has been rude to me, so that is what he can expect in return.
I never once used the word “superior” so I don’t know whom you are quoting. What is “LGF”, btw?
I won’t be going anywhere, but I will return to attacking liberals under my normal name in these forums.
Look, son, I realize you’re not getting it, but while I’m no longer an editor, I’m the one that pointed out to the editors that you were doing something we at PJM don’t consider appropriate, specifically posting personal information. It’s Not Done.
Bryan has explained it to you. It’s the rules. You don’t like it, darken someone else’s comments section.
For starters, I’m not impressed by your status as a former editor. Second, I don’t think that being a whiny, meddling little tattle-tale is something to brag about, regardless of whose “personal email address” you may happen to have.
When I was addressed directly by Bryan, – whose blog this is, in case you’ve forgotten – my reply was immediate, polite, and deferential. It is his forum, and he may conduct matters as he sees fit.
Finally, as far as refering to me as “son”- you are not my father. My father was an honorable man. You are also not my mother. But since you refer to me as “son”, perhaps you are both my mother and my father. IN that case, there is a specific action I would like to suggest to you.
For starters, I’m not impressed by your status as a former editor. Second, I don’t think that being a whiny, meddling little tattle-tale is something to brag about, regardless of whose “personal email address” you may happen to have.
When I was addressed directly by Bryan, – whose blog this is, in case you’ve forgotten – my reply was immediate, polite, and deferential. It is his forum, and he may conduct matters as he sees fit.
Finally, as far as referring to me as “son”- you are not my father. My father was an honorable man. You are also not my mother. But since you refer to me as “son”, perhaps you are both my mother and my father. IN that case, there is a specific action I would like to suggest to you.
Enough, guys. Peace. We are supposed to be on the same team. Granted, maybe I should have just posted a link to the guys registration info rather than posting his information here in this blog. Mea culpa.
BUT- I apologized to the only person who really deserves an apology, the blog owner, and I did so yesterday.
Anybody but Obama in 2012! Take the Senate! Take the White House! Return the USA to her people!
Sorry. Can’t compare an internet game made by video gamers to a film.
Where was the outrage on the anti-Obama internet games created since day one after he was elected? Not to mention the racist songs and pictures (some emailed by politicians & pundit heads). I recall seeing many internet games on GW Bush as well. Is it just because this particular game is much more advanced with great graphics and actually fun to play?
Relax. It’s only a game made by gamers! Much safer to play than Palin’s reality pin-the-bullseye-on-the-map game. Oh, and before anyone claims this game is racist, teabaggers are NOT a race. They have at least one black person and pictures to prove it. So, get over it.