Voter ID Has Broken Leftist Containment
Things are not going well for voter ID opponents. The latest James O’Keefe video is the most recent problem for the left. The bigger problem is that the voter ID debate has broken leftist containment, and the left has made an enormous strategic miscalculation by elevating the voter ID fight.
I was on the Darby/Stranahan show yesterday explaining why. (I start at minute 35; “breaking containment” starts at 47). The left didn’t count on voter ID becoming a national issue among Republicans and independents. Instead, the left wanted to keep the issue contained.
What do I mean by “broken leftist containment”? Travel back to 2005 for a successful leftist voter ID strategy. In 2005, Georgia passed a voter ID law. Because Georgia was subject to Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, the Justice Department had to preclear the law. The left activated their public relations machine to either stop the law inside DOJ, or take a pound of flesh after the Bush administration precleared the law. It was a win-win situation for the left.
After a bitter internal fight (that remains a subject of an ongoing internal DOJ inspector general investigation), the Bush DOJ precleared the Georgia voter ID law.
But the most important thing for the left was to keep knowledge of the voter ID anger and opposition contained within Democrat, left-wing, and civil rights circles. If the 80% of Americans who support voter ID learned about the leftist mobilization, it would hurt the effort to block the law. A counterattack from the right might follow.
The left overestimated their enemies in 2005. The counterattack never materialized, and the left kept containment on voter ID. The right was silent through this fight. There was no counter-mobilization in support of voter ID.
And that is why the MSM absolutely hates bloggers getting involved in any kind of media. The left can only hold power by keeping their opponents uninformed
Yeah, and that’s on top of having to keep most of their supporters uninformed.
It would not matter anyways if you informed a progressive/liberal. They lack the ability to reason.
You know the old saying…..”You can lead a liberal to the truth, but you can’t make ‘Em think.”
Yes, and if you interfere with their disinformation stream they get very upset and start breaking things.
I was going to say that the MSM or LSM as it is now called (is it lame stream or liberal stream) does its part to keep the uninformed “uninformed”.
It is truly remarkable how many of the Left’s victories can be traced to their historic success at keeping ordinary Americans from learning about what’s going on, right under our noses.
The Web might be the only effective countermeasure to the Left’s propaganda and news-filtration machines. Let’s make sure it stays open and free.
FWP@2,
Let’s make sure it stays open and free.
I think the operative action would be recover, and perhaps then, get to insuring its openess and freedom. The One and administration already possess the “kill switch.”
Can you imagine how angry Eric Holder is about that video?
James O’Keefe is gonna’ get himself a lot of IRS trouble.
I wonder why Holder honored the National Action Network by speaking at their convention?
They owe more than $1M in back taxes and yet our legal leader pays homage to their “leadership”!
Imagine how the media would have wailed if Alberto Gonzalez spoke to a Tea Party gathering that was behind (for years) on taxes.
I thought unpaid taxes was a requirement for a position in obama’s cabinet.
Actually, I think O’Keefe is already being investigated for potential vote fraud charges. If there is one thing the “little dictators” in government hate, it is being made a fool of, and O’Keefe did that to ‘em in spades.
They’d likely have a hard time making vote fraud charges stick. O’Keefe simply requested Holder’s ballot. He didn’t accept it and didn’t vote using it.
Correct, he didn’t use the ballot to vote – and gave it back.
Reminds me of my stint in retail. A “shopper” can stuff anything in their pocket and walk all over the store. It isn’t shoplifting or theft until they hit the street.
Infact, if you go back and watch the video again, he didn’t even ask “for” it, he asked if they had one for Eric Holder. He never took the ballot, instead said he didn’t have his ID, and when they said he didn’t need it, he said he would feel more comfortable if he went and got it. He then left without ever having taken the ballot.
The best way to ensure that we get the government we fairly voted for is to ensure clean and fair elections. They do not happen by wishful thinking. Action is required to purge voter rolls and to minimize voting fraud on election days. From my experience, many localities do not have the necessary two party representation at the polling location. But you never hear about this because the poll workers simply sign in as though they represent the other party. For those with the time and inclination, there are two things you can do to make a difference; 1)sign up to volunteer with True the Vote dot org, which is engaged in projects to clear out the obvious expired and fraudulent registrations (among other highly worthwhile things) and volunteer to work the polls in your county.
My voting precinct has voter I. D. laws in place and everyone I come in contact with at the place to vote says the same things, If you want a fair election you must provide ID. If you have nothing to hide and are not intent on voter fraud and stolen elections you will provide an ID to vote. You need ID to cash checks, drive a car, buy tobacco, alcohol, and apply for a job so what’s the big deal over an ID to vote? If you don’t want to show your ID for any of the above you don’t get any of these items or services. If your against no ID no vote the only reason is so you can vote more than once. The left wants to win so badly they will commit fraud therefore the left is against voter ID.
While I’m completely in favor of requiring a photo ID to vote, that by itself isn’t enough. Requiring photo ID just makes it a bit harder to vote more than once. It isn’t that hard to get a fake ID.
I like the idea of using ink to indicate that someone has voted like we saw with the Iraq elections several years ago. A good idea is a good idea regardless of where it originates. It would seem to me that anyone opposed to that idea would be someone in favor of casting multiple votes.
Agreed. Voter ID would make cheating more difficult, but would not eliminate such things as “finding” boxes of “uncounted ballots” in closets, car trunks, etc.
Or hanging chads, curtesy of crooked poll workers handing off stacks of ballots.
Of course, we’d also have to get rid of another favorite tool of the donks, voting by mail (except in cases where it’s necessary, such as military voting). Donks have been pushing hard for all-mail elections for years.
See Washington State gubernatorial election 2004 for why.
While the lefties make a big deal about the elderly or blacks or Hispanics, I would argue that Voter ID would have a bigger effect on college students who now vote at home and also in their college communities. Until now they had nothing to worry about, but what if multiple voting was a felony? IMO not nearly as many would care to risk a felony conviction, and convictions would be much easier to obtain.
Splendid. Add to that the very effective, very visible efforts of the great organization True The Vote. Using thousands of volunteers, True The Vote exposed the great fraud of the Scott Walker recall petition. Unfortunately, not enough to turn back the election, but the amount of fraud found was stunning nonetheless.
The Left cannot hide from this. I look daily for lights in this haven of darkness this administration has become. This column gives me hope. Thanks. I need it.
I think the New Black Panthers should enforce Voter ID with them there black sticks…
I have a little black Beretta that trumps their little black sticks should they choose to attempt any voter intimidation at my poling place.
If one has to cheat and lie to get into, and hold onto, a tax payer paid job, is that person worthy of us? Obviously, no. I often wonder why we the people have remained so civil in the eye of tyranny. The upcoming election ought to separate the wheat from the chafe. This is not a third world environment, whether or not obama and ilk like it. Maybe these people should be given a territory to develop in their eyes only. There are plenty of followers waiting to enjoy the eutopia that is promised.
In line at my local Wal-Mart last night. In front of me were two carts filled to the brim, a young Hispanic couple, their two kids and one in the oven. One cart was filled to overflowing with cases upon cases of water and sodas and various other drinks. The other cart was filled to the brim with food. They must have paid three different times with different pieces of paper (thank you welfare state!), but that’s beside the point.
At the end of the last small purchase (to be paid for with cash this time) was a six-pack of Modelo beer.
“Can I see your ID please?”
Now, the guy looked old enough to me, but under 35 so the cashier was doing his job.
“Que?”
After the wife translated, we then had to look at the chart on the register as to what six forms of ID Wal-Mart accepts for these types of purchases. The guy could not produce a single one of them, so the beer stayed with Sam.
Wonder when we’ll see the ACLU or Rev. Al or SEIU picketing Wal-Mart to get them to stop this raaaaaaaacist, dehumanizing, rights-trampling practice of theirs?
Excellent post!
Thanks Charlie! Sad, but very true.
I’m aghast. First off, this O’Keefe character committed voter fraud. Why are you psycho-neocons glossing over that? The man committed a serious federal offense. It’s akin to treason. This country used to execute people for supposed treason (think the Rosenbergs here). But if the treason benefits some sick, far, far right protocol, then it’s not a crime at all, heh? Second, how dare any of you try to deny the right of some poor minority, who can’t read or write, and who has a hard time finding a job because of some disability, and who barely speaks the language, from exercising that first and foremost of rights….VOTING!? My lord, you sickos would deny some poor Guatemalen quadrapelegic, who came to this great country just to cast a freakin’ vote and maybe grab a delicious Subway footlong tuna, the right to say, “Bueno, this is the great, dear leader I choose!”. It all boils down to racism….whitey against the world.
Would you please cite the statute that O’Keefe violated? The code section. I will approve your comment when you do.
Crickets…
Don’t feed the troll.
It’s hard to believe that this post by LovelyEarth isn’t some sort of misfired satire.
The giveaway, for me, is the: “…some poor Guatemalen (sic) quadrapelegic (sic)”. I know that these days it’s getting ever-harder to tell a “straight” statement from the American left from parody, but I think I can still spot the difference. Just barely…..
Mr. Adams, methinks your sarcasm detector needs to be calibrated.
Chris…dude. LovelyEarth has been around for awhile. I know it’s hard to tell the difference sometimes between jokesters and Leftists, but… come on now.
@ DirtyGirl (or Filthy Boy, as the case may be):
Please take your prescribed medications.
You are a raving lunatic. Nothing you said makes any sense. Try using the facts as they exist on THIS planet.
Does the truth make you uncomfortable?
1Jo 4:1 ¶ Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world.
Any candidate that needs one fraudulent vote to get elected will lie about other things and is not fit for the office. If that is your choice you may not get the results you expected.
Actually, I would happily deny that poor Guatemalan, if he is not a citizen and therefore ineligible. In case you missed the point, we can’t begin to tell who has that first and foremost right without guaranteeing their identity first. You really can’t be this stupid, can you?
The Rosenbergs gave the atomic bomb to the Soviet Union. If you don’t think that is treason, I don’t know where you would draw the line.
Please do tell us what law James O’Keefe violated.
After that, tell us why your reaction to voter ID laws is “they are wrong” as opposed to “we should provide free IDs to the poor.” I mean, lefties are reliably in favor of giving things to the poor. On this topic, we’d agree with you.
Yet somehow, on this occasion, free stuff doesn’t apply. I wonder what that’s about?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Aw jeez, ignorance must truly be bliss.
This is a sure loser for the progressive scum who believe that the only way they can win is by stuffing the ballot box with illegal votes.
If you are against the production of ID you are in favor of rigged elections, it’s that simple.
Hey PJ, I know you have little to no control of the google ads placed on your page but the lying http://www.democraticgovernors.org is on your site, in this article, stating that lie that Bush robbed Gore in Florida. Even after an independent audit proved otherwise, they (Democrats) still are trying to spread the lie. Anyway, do you have any control over the ads, so at least we are not exposed to the leftist lies? Or next do we get to see the Michelle “join us” ad crap too?
I think that org. pays for those ads. Fine by me if they waste their money here! Click the ad and cost ‘em more!
…re Steve #14,
At the very bottom of this page is “Contact Us” as a lighted link. Send an email mentioning your thoughts about ads, and you’ll get an answer. Also, there’s the highlighted word “Advertising” on that same bottom line of contact words. They don’t want to cause offense while trying to do their job.
I objected some time ago to a creeping ad which appeared from the right hand side and which moved as I scrolled to get away from it. Very annoying. I haven’t seen any lately.
This sort of thing bugs me too, but then I think it’s better in the long run that the libs waste their advertising budget on sites where practically no-one gives a flying fornication about their “message”.
Bingo.
Yes, PLEASE! Let Barry and Michelle and the rest of the Dems take their hard-stolen dollars and put them to good use helping to publish PJM!
It’s not like any regular readers are going to be swayed by those ads, so let that money flow!
Today’s Left reminds me of the Roman Catholic Church’s imposition of the ‘Dark Ages’ in medeivel times…where they kept the common folks from learning God’s Word by keeping them illiterate and controlling access to the Bible. Thanks to the invention of the printing press in the 1600s, Bibles began to be printed en mass, and the people began learing to read it; removing the Church’s power.
Todays’ Left thinks it has a monopoly on education and news; but the wise seek Truth & wisdom and have become too smart for the Left to control! This drives them NUTS! I LOVE IT!
Ecclesiastes 10:2-3, “The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left. Even as he walks along the road, the fool lacks sense and shows everyone how stupid he is.”
How can we do anything but laugh at the Left? They’re so entertaining! LOL!
You need to get your history right. The Catholic Church didn’t “keep” the masses illiterate and control access to the Bible. It was just that books and education were inherently so expensive that most people couldn’t afford them. It took a scribe working full time two to three years to copy a Bible by hand, and the printing presses that pre-dated Gutenberg’s movable type weren’t much faster. Even before considering materials, the price of that Bible had to support the monk for the time it took him to copy it. Learning to read wasn’t any easier, since so many people were educated primarily through job training. Those educated enough to be able to read were encouraged to read the Bible, but a Bible isn’t much use to the illiterate.
15 Catherine and Myth Buster, You are both uninformed about European history, written by the victors, but there was a people not of the Catholic faith that did exist with the Catholic but were called heretics and cut slack at times and severely persecuted at other times. These heretics had no problem having and reading scripture. They went by many different names but one doctrine. There were other non-Catholics but this group was tracked by Thielman J van Braght in his Martyr’s Mirror compiled about 1650 in the Dutch language but translated into English and currently available Since that is a bit before my time I will let the book speak for the conditions that did exist during the Dark Ages. This book does testify that the Catholic did discourage the reading of the Bible.
That’s flatly false. Unless one had written permission from his bishop (which was rarely granted), possesion of or even READING the Bible was forbidden until quite late. (Don’t recall the date, but it was 19th century or so). Many people were punished – sometimes sometimes martyred – for merely reading a copy of the Bible.
The printing press broke the RCC’s embargo of the Bible, which brought about the Reformation.
And your repeat of that oft told lie about the Church “imposing” the Dark Ages on Europe should remind all of us of how hard friendly lies are to root out when once implanted in the minds of ideologues with an ax to grind and no respect for truth. Keep up the friendly fire and the socialists won’t have to beat us!
Better yet, try studying some history instead of clinging to age old libels.
Try Cannon 14 of the Council of Toulouse, 1229:
OR maybe the Council of Tarragona, 1234:
“No one may possess the books of the Old and New Testaments in the Romance language, and if anyone possesses them he must turn them over to the local bishop within eight days after promulgation of this decree, so that they may be burned lest, be he a cleric or a layman, he be suspected until he is cleared of all suspicion.”
Then there’s the list of banned books published by Papal Bull under Pope Pius IV, 1559:
Or we could look at
As late as 1930, Cardinal Merry de Val, “Forward,” in the official “Index of Prohibited Books”, published by order of Pius XI, tells us:
Somehow all of that doesn’t sound like, “an old libel”.
It’s simply historical fact, which can be verified quite easily from exclusively Roman Catholic sources.
That was fantastic! I would also like to note that under King Charles in England being found carrying a Bible was an offense that could warrant instant execution. This in part was Charles war against the Calvinists, both English and Scottish, though in the main it fell against what we today call the Scots-Irish, those that were low land Scots and border English. Charles was determined to make the Scots Presbyterian church subservient to the Anglican church and its book of common prayer. The Scots were not, thousands signed a covenant in their own blood and tied red neckerchiefs around their necks to symbolize their willingness to lose their heads over the issue. The English called them rednecks. Those rednecks supported William of Orange against the Catholics of Ireland and were called Billy boys. In Ireland they still are. When they came to the hills and Hooper’s of America Billy boys became Hillbillies. Despite the image over 70% of those immigrants could read because reading the Bible was incredibly important. Reading other books may not have been but Bible reading was. Oh, the history we have lost! Those, like the person above that attempted revise the history of the Catholic church, infuriate me! And so I love to see a good smackdown of revisionists. It happens much too rarely.
Hollers not Hooper’s! Damnable instant spell check
Damn those Catholics for manipulating the rise of the “barracks emperors” and the Teutonic invasions! If it hadn’t been for those meddling monks, Rome could have gone on for centuries…like Pharaonic Egypt after the Ramessids.
Just simply amazing that the lame stream media, lap dogs for the current administration, won’t report on this story accurately.
Try getting into a newspaper office, and not having ID, won’t happen. So the lame stream lap dog media, are putting up limits that they think are wrong.
And what is this with people can’t get IDs. Are these the poor and disenfranchised that are receiving government benefits, sort of like the guy in Mass. that wanted to use his food stamp card to pay for his bail?
I think once again the media has no clue, and when they didn’t understand 2010, they may not understand 2012. And at that point other than sports, entertainment, crosswords, comics and coupons, they may no longer be relevant.
Actually barry 1817 we get our sports, entertainment, crosswords, comics & coupons off the internet. They are already not relevant.
Every day you do NOT have photo I.D.’s for elections, you hand greater victories for disreputable and illegal organizations like ACORN and its affiliates. THAT is why the Democrats do NOT want photo I.D.s. They do not want them because it will help prevent them from fixing elections, especially close ones. If we had a photo I.D. law in place in Minnesota a few years ago, do you really think Al Franken would be a Senator? Give me a break. Al Franken is a Senator because ACORN wanted him to become a Senator, and the country is worse off because of it. We must have the photo I.D. if we are going to come close to having fair elections. If you need a photo I.D. to drive, get on a plane, or just show identification to cash a check, you can show a Photo I.D. to vote.
Photo ID should be a must to vote in any election in the USA.
Any legal citizen of the USA has a responsibility to vote. However it is up to the citizen to acquire a photo ID from the DMV. based on birth certificate, Or passport, or military ID.
Preregistration for the privilege to vote must be at least one week in advance of the election.
No early voting allowed with one exception Absentee ballots. No ballots can be counted until all military ballots are counted. Absentee means out of the State nothing else.
No vote by mail. One exception absentee ballots.
Any electronic voting machines used must have an automatic recount of hard copy for official documentation of the results. Electronic count cannot stand alone because of its vulnerability to malware and cheating.
All elections must have a hard copy recount for accuracy and credibility for official documentation.
In addition on electronic voting I would split the vote record to at least three different recording devices as close to the actual vote as possible so that each interested party would have a separate copy of the actual vote in their possession plus at least one for the legal record. That would reduce the possibility of outside influence.
Excellent! One addition, absentee ballots must be available in state for the homebound, those hospitalized, in nursing homes, etc. And military absentee ballots must have been mailed out in a timely manner or nothing is counted until they have had sufficient time to have been returned. Other legitimate out of state/country ballots should be available if requested in a timely fashion with proof of inability to be present at the polls. A civilian spouse or state department employee in Germany is a citizen too.
Another good idea from above. Fraud at the polls, including multiple voting, should be a felony with a minimum mandatory jail sentence. If by a non-citizen, permanent expulsion from the US, no exceptions- after the sentence is completed. Any proven involvement with any type of voter fraud should make the perpetrator permanently inelgible to hold any position of public trust, to include employment by any government entity.
An honest vote is our only guarantee of liberty and the rule of law, short of the extremely uncertain and devastating need for revolution.
I’ve used early voting many times. It has some advantages. Remember back in 2000 when the “Bush DUI” story was dropped the weekend before the election? Early voting makes it harder to get away with mischief like the last weekend smear job. When people can vote early, they won’t be influenced by the smear. If they try to pull the smear job in time for the early voters, it gives the smearee time to respond before election day.
Supreme Court upholds voter ID law. Stevens: Law justified to protect integrity, reliability of electoral process. Evan Vucci / AP file Indiana Solicitor General Thomas Fisher succeeded in proving his voter ID case to the U.S. Supreme Court, with the court’s ruling coming just one week before his state’s primary vote. 4/28/2008
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24351798/ns/politics/t/supreme-court-upholds-voter-id-law/
Where valid ID’s are required (Hint: Not when voting) FEBRUARY 21, 2012
http://www.mrconservative.com/2012/02/2072-where-valid-ids-are-required-hint-not-when-voting/
That was a section 2 case under the voting rights Act, (in Indiana). Totally different set up, totally different issues.
I believe most of us can agree that Obama & Co. are going to utilize every tactic and ploy they can contrive to win the November elections, especially Obama’s reelection. Even allowing illegal aliens to vote when and where it can be done. Dead people, convicts, non-citizens, minors, you name it. Four more years of O’s regime will permanently change (for the worst) the character of our nation, and O and his Democrat advisers, and henchmen, want it so bad, they can taste it. It might be instructive to know how elections are done in….Kenya.
If you want an honest government:
1) Select Representatives by means of a draft lottery, qualifications for inclusion to the pool of prospective draftees to be determined by each state.
2) Repeal the 17th Amendment. Give the selection of Senators back to the state legislatures, with the addition of term limits and the right of recall by the state Governor, the state legislature, and plebiscite.
3) Remove the pay of federal legislators and staff from the federal domain. The state sending these people to Congress should be paying ‘em.
I never knew how much the left cheated until I started seeing how much they are fighting voter ID. Being from Minnesota, were a Leftist Senator and Governor won by the slimmest of margin, the libs here are flopping on the ground in fits. Our own Lib AG had outrageous disenfranchisement statistics on his official state web site! When asked where he came up with his numbers he pulled them off. Even though he has had hundreds of complaints of potential voter fraud he refuses to investigate because, get this, no voter fraud has ever been detected. Follow THAT logic.
…afterthought….
I noticed while showing my Voter Registration card at the desk to vote in the Maryland Primary that the clerk asked me for my birthday (presumably as some sort of a check with the printed lists in front of her) but made a point of not asking for the year of my birth.
If we identify each voter then we are far more apt to get a true vote. If we ink the finger when the vote is cast then we eliminate multiple voting by whatever means might be used. IS identification so difficult that any citizen cannot have identification, which he more than likely already has.
If the voter does not have enough interest to select his candidate, should he be trying to vote anyway? If I have to be bribed to vote that vote shouldn’t count and that candidate should lose his right to be a candidate. Yes I know this goes beyond our ability to fully control.
But is we try the spirits, as John suggests in 1 John 4:1 we will find that same spirit in the race baiting that is being manifested in the Trayvon Martin case and In J. Christian Adams report yesterday on the daylight stabbing by that motorcycle gang, With the UN injecting itself in the Trayvon Martin case we see the international power that is behind this race baiting agitation to violence over a tragedy that has all the earmarks of an unplanned accident. I say accidentbecause each party reacted to the circumstance by making their own choice and it wound up with a fatality. From where I sit it looks like both parties were using poor jucgment. Travon could have asked Zimmerman why he was following and there is no indication that Zimmerman had any ill will toward Travon but had sufficient reason to suspect that he was up to no good. I think Trayvon confirmed that suspicion, why else would he attack?
The real story is the international spirit that is behind and supporting the racial issues that don’t seem to exist?
I have to admit to a certain bafflement – as to what the Voter ID laws are actually supposed to accomplish.
Keeping the rolls clean is a good thing, no one can argue against that. The only thing is, this set of laws is a solution in search of a problem, since “voter fraud” has been shown to be happening, in large part, nowhere. The only time it’s really come up is the “ACORN frenzy” – which was a hoax.
No law is without a downside. This one makes it more difficult for people without comprehensive ID to vote, despite being perfectly within their rights to do so as Americans. I could live with that, if someone could show me a good reason to enact these laws in the first place.
So Kevin -
How many convictions, nationally, for voter fraud would it take to convince you that voter fraud is a real problem? Say, within that last 4 years.
If you can’t come up with a number that would convince you that there is a real problem, then I suggest that you do not want to be convinced.
Landslide Lyndon got more votes in his district than there were voters.
I frequently publish on my facebook status everytime me or my wife get “disenfranchised” (have our civil rights trampled) by requiring us to provide valid photo ID to buy liquor, check into the local hospital for surgery, get attended at the local urgent care clinic, or travel via airplane anywhere (after getting fondled / felt up by TSA of course)! I do this mainly to tweak my more liberal friends but also to get my other friends to note / be aware that there’s a lot of stuff we take for granted that we can’t do without valid photo ID and if it disenfranchises folks to require it to vote in local, state, and Federal elections then why don’t we get rid of the requirement for any photo ID anytime (ridiculous of course)! I hope it gets as many as possible thinking about the ridiculousness of the lefts opposition to this (other than to blantently allow voter fraud)! Kudos to O’Keefe and his team for their “punking” Holder in his voter district!
Gotta love e-media Comments. From the well-researched and stunningly sublime to the absolutely false and supremely ridiculous. What an Internet!
I don’t have much in the way sublimity to offer today (if I ever did, or will) but I will offer readers another visit to Another Slow News Day’s blog, to the page where this issue is also being tracked.
http://anotherslownewsday.wordpress.com/election-fraud/
You’re welcome.
The left MUST oppose voter ID because, if implemented, it means they will lose more elections and lose more power. Everything else said is irrelevant, except to speculate what the left will do when they inevitably lose voter ID battles. I predict they will resort to vote count fraud to replace the loss.
Mr. Adams,
Will you please do an article regarding this secret doj force? Pretty please?
http://www.whitehousedossier.com/2012/04/17/secretive-doj-force-watces-trayvon-protests/