The Sorry State of American Counterintelligence

John Schindler reports:

What I’ve termed the counterintelligence imperative just doesn’t seem all that imperative to IC bigwigs, who continue to regard CI as a nuisance and an afterthought. This reluctance seems an immutable law of the vast, sprawling, and expensive Intelligence Community, having long ago been institutionalized. A dozen years ago, a former NSA director bemoaned American CI’s “dismal performance,” noting that counterintelligence is fragmented, under-resourced, and neglected, and none of that has improved since. If anything, it’s gotten worse.

Counterintelligence continues to be regarded as something less than a full-time job by most IC leadership, who prefer not to think about it at all. Just how peripheral CI is to U.S. intelligence was made clear by an assessment done by the Congressional Research Service back in late April 2013. This detailed study, intended to be a primer on the Intelligence Community for Congress, was a walk-through of the entire IC, with analysis of which agencies do what as well as explanations of all the various -INTs. Yet, in this thirty-page study, the word “counterintelligence” never appears, not even once.


It’s too bad I already used up today’s “Required Reading” slot, because Schindler’s column deserves a “Read the whole thing.”

By its nature, counterintel is unglamorous work, which ideally shouldn’t involve any big headlines, or necessitate any sexy satellite launches.

But that doesn’t mean we need to suck at it, although clearly we do.


Trending on PJ Media Videos

Join the conversation as a VIP Member