Even the New York Times is starting to have fun with its Weiner stories. The latest headline:
And even the New York Times is getting fed up with the overexposed congressman’s stonewalling:
Mr. Weiner has not spoken about his troubles since last week, and he has not appeared at a series of previously scheduled public events. Reached on his cellphone by a reporter for The New York Times on Monday, Mr. Weiner said, “I’ll have to call you back,” and hung up.
But they’re still playing coy with what’s going on down under in that infamous picture:
After denying that he had sent a suggestive photograph of himself to a Seattle woman on Twitter, Mr. Weiner left open the possibility that he might have appeared in the image, which depicts a man from the waist down in his gray boxer briefs.
From the waist down — yes. But also at full attention. Or is that news unfit to print for the dainty readership of the New York Times?
Join the conversation as a VIP Member