12-13-2018 08:38:49 AM -0700
12-12-2018 10:18:40 AM -0800
12-12-2018 07:39:32 AM -0800
12-11-2018 02:41:26 PM -0800
12-11-2018 01:01:06 PM -0800
It looks like you've previously blocked notifications. If you'd like to receive them, please update your browser permissions.
Desktop Notifications are  | 
Get instant alerts on your desktop.
Turn on desktop notifications?
Remind me later.
PJ Media encourages you to read our updated PRIVACY POLICY and COOKIE POLICY.

Stretch, grab a late afternoon cup of caffeine and get caught up on the most important news of the day with our Coffee Break newsletter. These are the stories that will fill you in on the world that's spinning outside of your office window - at the moment that you get a chance to take a breath.
Sign up now to save time and stay informed!

Trump Trolls the Pearl-Clutchers

Once again, it is time to ask: "If we assume Trump is not a fool, what strategy would his actions indicate?"

Let's start with yesterday's tweet from Brian Stelter:

Of course, this is all about the famous tweeted GIF of Trump clotheslining a CNN-headed man in a WWE event, which, if I understand the people reacting to it, is the worst thing EVAH and proves Trump is Literally Hitler. And someone remind me that I need a meme that says "No, that's isn't what 'literally' means."

Of course, anyone who has been paying attention and isn't suffering from the Trump Trance recalls doing bad Shakespeare in order to indulge Trump-assassination fantasies, or the number of celebrities who have threatened Trump or fantasized about his death, or running stories on how many would have to be killed to get a Democrat in the White House, or, this cover:

... although, at least, that one does conclude that assassinating Trump would be unethical.

There's already been plenty written on the pearl-clutching going on, so I'm not going to comment except to say "show me on this doll where the bad video hurt you."

Instead, let's just ask what Trump is up to. Yeah, he's not being "presidential." Did anyone really expect him to be? Certainly, I thought his behavior might lose the election, but it didn't: he won. Why should he change?

In the meantime, though, right now about three-quarters of Americans think the press is biased against Trump. Given the dozens of stories that have been pushed by major media and then proven false, including the recent one that was so false CNN fired three senior people over them and added VP-level vetting for any further Trump/Russia stories, it doesn't seem like an unreasonable conclusion.