07-20-2018 11:40:18 AM -0700
07-19-2018 01:47:29 PM -0700
07-19-2018 10:16:35 AM -0700
07-19-2018 07:10:51 AM -0700
07-18-2018 06:46:32 AM -0700
It looks like you've previously blocked notifications. If you'd like to receive them, please update your browser permissions.
Desktop Notifications are  | 
Get instant alerts on your desktop.
Turn on desktop notifications?
Remind me later.

Stretch, grab a late afternoon cup of caffeine and get caught up on the most important news of the day with our Coffee Break newsletter. These are the stories that will fill you in on the world that's spinning outside of your office window - at the moment that you get a chance to take a breath.
Sign up now to save time and stay informed!

The Death of 'Meals on Wheels'? Not Even Close

Anytime the president or Congress attempts to cut a few dollars from the federal budget, the wails of pain and anguish can be heard from one end of the country to the other. You're killing the poor/aged/sick/homeless/disabled/women/ and children, children, children!

Sheesh, what a bunch of meanies we are.

In previous attempts to rein in federal spending, the "cuts" have largely been reductions in the annual increases to those budgets. In other words, even though more dollars were being spent in the fiscal year the cuts were to occur than in the previous budget, the annual rate of increase in that spending was reduced.

Liberals consider this a cut because all federal programs -- like the roses in your garden -- have an absolute right to grow.

And you wonder how federal spending got out of control?

President Trump is looking to change all that. He is looking to make absolute cuts -- actual reductions in spending that would eliminate monies for entire programs. Because he plans on increasing budgets for other departments, including Defense, there will be no overall reduction in federal spending. But the idea is revolutionary enough that it has liberals and every special interest group from here to Timbuktu squealing like a hog dragged away from the feeding trough.

The current target of liberal ire is the proposed elimination of funding for Community Development Block Grants -- a $3 billion budgetary item from the Department of Housing and Urban Development.  Contained within those grants is money for the "Meals on Wheels" program that performs the noble task of feeding elderly Americans who usually live alone and either can't afford food or prepare foods due to infirmity.

Liberals have hit the ceiling, claiming that President Trump wants to totally eliminate the program and force seniors to eat dog food or something.

Forbes' Erik Sherman explains why that's a crock:

But the situation is complicated and saying that the budget eliminates the Meals on Wheels program is factually incorrect. According to the Meals on Wheels annual IRS filing for 2015 (it isn't a government program), approximately 3.3% of its funding comes from government sources. Most is from corporate and foundation grants, with individual contributions the second-largest source. Government grants are actually the fifth-largest source of revenue.

If its portions of block grants were eliminated, the program wouldn't suddenly disappear. However, the organization says that it already cannot keep up with growing demand from seniors who need help. In addition, Meals on Wheels passes funding down to 5,000 local groups that provide food, and they additionally might be affected by the funding cut.

Will there be consequences for the program (and others, obviously)? Of course. However, resorting to hysteria is dangerous, and that is happening, both among many on the political left and some media outlets. Such statements can make valid criticism look uninformed and foolish.

Instead, people who are concerned need to dig into the specifics of what is happening, understand the real implications, and then address those.