02-16-2018 12:28:03 PM -0800
01-23-2018 09:55:12 AM -0800
01-18-2018 11:02:22 AM -0800
01-09-2018 01:54:15 PM -0800
12-22-2017 09:40:32 AM -0800
It looks like you've previously blocked notifications. If you'd like to receive them, please update your browser permissions.
Desktop Notifications are  | 
Get instant alerts on your desktop.
Turn on desktop notifications?
Remind me later.


Stretch, grab a late afternoon cup of caffeine and get caught up on the most important news of the day with our Coffee Break newsletter. These are the stories that will fill you in on the world that's spinning outside of your office window - at the moment that you get a chance to take a breath.
Sign up now to save time and stay informed!

'New York Times' Gets Aleppo Wrong — TWICE! — in Article Mocking Johnson

Here's what you call karma: Like all other media outlets on Thursday, The New York Times pounced on Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson for sheepishly asking "What is Aleppo?" in an interview on MSNBC's "Morning Joe." Unlike other outlets, America's newspaper of record actually messed up on what Aleppo iswhile mocking Johnson for not knowing it. After changing the article, the Times got it wrong again.

In the original report, the Times' Alan Rappeport called the Syrian city "the de facto capital of the Islamic State." As the Washington Free Beacon's David Rutz noted, the real de facto capital of ISIS is Raqqa, or Al-Raqqa.

Even worse, the article began by declaring that Johnson "revealed a surprising lack of foreign policy knowledge on Thursday ... when he could not answer a basic question about the crisis in Aleppo, Syria." Did the New York Times itself reveal "a surprising lack of foreign policy knowledge"?

Here's the evidence:

But wait, it gets better!

After the Times realized its mistake, it edited the text — misidentifying Aleppo yet again! The second article described Aleppo as "the capital of Syria." Yet again, this is incorrect, but this mistake is even worse as the real Syrian capital — Damascus — should be well-known to anyone with a preliminary knowledge of the Middle East.

Eventually, the outlet updated the story yet again, finally correctly identifying Aleppo as a "war-torn Syrian city."

Ironically, the Times' gaffe is arguably worse than Johnson's. Not only did the author clearly not know what Aleppo is, he didn't even ask what it is. At least Johnson, when he was confronted out of the blue with the question "what would you do, if you were elected, about Aleppo?" simply and humbly asked, "What is Aleppo?"

He later admitted that this was a mistake: "For those that believe this is a disqualifier, so be it. But, you know what, I've been really well served in my life by always telling the truth. ... And I think the one unforgivable in life is hypocrisy." Again, we get the humble, soft-spoken Johnson as opposed to a lofty New York Times out to correct us all, only to get the facts wrong.

Here are the corrections, in all their glory:

Next Page: Check out the resulting mockery on Twitter, and how people misspelled the Syrian city...