The PJ Tatler

Be All That You Can Be: Transgenders Coming to Military

Recent moves by the Pentagon to expand the rights of gays and lesbians in the military has built momentum for lifting the ban on transgendered persons serving in the ranks.

The Hill:

“In politics, I think it’s always appropriate to take advantage of timing. Whether it’s taking down the Confederate flag or creating equality in the military for transgender persons,” said Rep. Jackie Speier (D-Calif.).

She plans to introduce legislation next month that calls on the Pentagon to immediately grant anti-discrimination protection for all service members, and their dependents, who identify as transgender.

The bill, which is still being drafted, would also direct the Defense secretary to hammer out new policies for transgender troops, from regulations about their uniforms to what treatments would be covered under Tricare, the military’s healthcare system.

Separately, Rep. Mike Honda (D-Calif.) on Thursday lead a group of nearly 20 House members in a letter to Defense Secretary Ashton Carter that urged him to do away with the policy.

“People should be evaluated on performance, not gender,” Honda, who has a transgender granddaughter, said in a statement

Any effort to do away with the prohibition is likely to face stiff resistance in a GOP-controlled Congress.

House Armed Services Committee Chairman Mac Thornberry (R-Texas) has said the decision on the ban should be left to the Pentagon.

The department “needs to look at a variety of policies. As long as they look at it objectively, based on what’s best for the security interests of the country, then we’ll oversee or review what they do,” he told The Hill.

“When there’s a sense that there’s some extraneous social or political agenda … people get concerned,” Thornberry added.

Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman John McCain (R-Ariz.) struck a similar chord.

“The administration policy should always be a basis for our discussion,” he said.

Transgender activists say that, while they are heartened by the increased focus on the issue, they aren’t about to pin their hopes on Capitol Hill.

They note that, while lawmakers led the charge in the 2011 repeal of “Don’t ask, don’t tell,” the Clinton-era law that prohibited gay and lesbian people from serving openly in the military, the transgender ban is department-level policy.

“Everyone in advocacy believes this needs to be a Pentagon thing,” said Mara Keisling, executive director of the National Center for Transgender Equality. She added that the legislative push could wind up being an “education and advocacy tool.”

Not one word from transgender rights advocates about the effect of the change in policy on our military’s ability to fight a war. Shouldn’t that be the top concern, rather than the politics of the issue?

Frankly, I couldn’t care less how someone wants to identify. None of my business. But what about the men and women in their units? Would it affect cohesion? Morale? Fighting ability?

And then there’s the question of whether taxpayers should foot the bill for a sex change operation. If someone wants to mutilate their bodies, they should have to do it on their own dime. It’s ludicrous to ask taxpayers to fund someone’s delusion — or fantasy.

But none of this matters. Transgenders will have their right to serve whether it debases our military or not. The old Army jingle “Be all that you can be” will take on an entirely different meaning.