ABC Moderators Were Lying: EIGHT ‘Aborted’ Babies Were Born Alive & Then Left to Die in Minnesota

Darrell Frost

“There is no state in this country where it is legal to kill a baby after it’s born,” said ABC debate moderator Linsey Davis, as she smugly “fact-checked” the Republican nominee. “Madam vice president, I want to get your response to President Trump.”

Advertisement

“Well, as I said, you’re going to hear a bunch of lies,” eagerly agreed Kamala Harris. And then she proceeded to tell a bunch of lies.

But in this exchange, the first lie was told by ABC’s Linsey Davis. And either ironically or coincidentally, one of the places where babies can legally be killed post-birth is in the state of Minnesota — where her running mate, Tim Walz, is currently governor.

The Daily Signal examined several years of data from the Minnesota Department of Health: At least eight babies who survived abortions — and were thus born alive — were later killed, or left to die. 

In fact, during the narrow timeframe of January 1, 2021, through December 21, 2021 (one year), five babies were born post-abortion operation. Of those five infants:

No one tried to save the first baby, who was allegedly born with “fetal anomalies” and died shortly thereafter.

The second and third babies were given unspecified “comfort care measures” on their first (and last) birthdays. Neither baby survived.

The fourth and fifth babies were deemed “previable,” which is defined as the stage of fetal maturity when there’s a much lower probability of survival outside of the uterus, but thanks to medical advances, the range of previability is shifting; it’s often considered a “gray zone” for ethical decision-making. Regardless, no efforts were made to save either baby. 

The Daily Signal also uncovered Minnesota’s records from January 1, 2019, through December 31, 2019 (one year): Three babies were born alive after an attempted abortion, and three times these babies were allowed to die.

Advertisement

One suffered from “fetal anomalies,” yet had “residual cardiac activity” —  medical slang for a beating heart —  for two solid minutes. Alas, the doctors opted to forego any attempt to save the baby’s life: According to the records, “the infant did not survive.”

Of the last two, one baby passed away while being given “comfort care measures.” The other was deemed previable; no attempt was made to help the infant.

It’s unclear if 2019 and 2021 are the only two years where Minnesota’s medical data is still publicly available.

However, thanks to the intrepid efforts of Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, the American people will never hear about this again. Outlets like The Daily Signal (and their reporter, Mary Margaret Olohan, who broke this story) won’t be writing about botched abortions or government-protected infanticide anymore…

…because, in 2023, Governor Tim Walz repealed the bipartisan measure that kept track of the number of born-alive babies and required doctors to protect an infant’s “life and health.”

Problem solved!

Minnesota used to have some restrictions on abortion. Then, in 2023, Governor Walz signed a new law that allows abortion all the way through the ninth month. (Or, apparently, even after.)

Furthermore, unless I’ve missed a memo, Minnesota is a state in the United States of America. So why did Linsey Davis choose to interject herself into the presidential debate, correct and chastise one of the candidates, and smugly declare there’s “no state in this country where it is legal to kill a baby after it’s born”?

Advertisement

It’s not just Minnesota either: According to Axios, six states — plus Washington, D.C. — have completely unrestricted abortion. Other organizations put it at nine states, plus D.C. But no matter how you look at it, the answer is absolutely NOT “no state in this country.”

Either Linsey Davis — and by extension, ABC News — is guilty of an astonishing level of incompetence and flubbed a critically important fact during a presidential debate, or they were deliberately lying to the American people, hoping to trick us into voting for their preferred candidate.

If the former is true, then they’re airheads who deserve to be fired. But if the latter is true, then they’ve become the literal embodiment of Fake News and misinformation. This is approaching Goebbels-level propaganda. 

Telling lies to obscure the deaths of innocent babies is kinda difficult to defend. ABC, we await your response.

Recommended

Trending on PJ Media Videos

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Advertisement
Advertisement