06-21-2018 04:10:41 PM -0700
06-21-2018 08:27:13 AM -0700
06-20-2018 09:04:40 AM -0700
06-20-2018 06:42:47 AM -0700
06-19-2018 10:24:27 PM -0700
It looks like you've previously blocked notifications. If you'd like to receive them, please update your browser permissions.
Desktop Notifications are  | 
Get instant alerts on your desktop.
Turn on desktop notifications?
Remind me later.

The Disappearance of the World

The "world" -- a phrase we will return to later -- has seemingly become more dangerous ever since the the U.S. has stopped running from challenges, even as critics complain it turns on them without a strategy. The EU, by contrast, has kept running but is now at a dead end, penned in by a Brexit secession to the West, a new czar in Russia to the East, and by the bold claims of a new sultan to the South.

Erdogan's claim to new dictatorial powers on the basis of a narrow and disputed referendum victory in Turkey has put him on a "collision course" with Europe, according to the Wall Street Journal:

European reaction to the vote was cautious. In a statement, European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker and two other top officials said they had taken note of the reported results in Turkey but would await the assessment of international monitors on the vote including on “alleged irregularities.”

The vote is effectively a Turkish withdrawal from membership application in the European Union. Even Eurocrats can't justify admitting an Erdogan under the banner of multiculturalism.

The EU is dead in the water. Everywhere one looks, whether it is the U.S. turning on its foes or the EU ignoring them, a crisis is at hand. The Turkish setbacks come after a fortnight of confrontation with Assad in Syria and Kim Jong Un in North Korea; these are more beginnings than endings. Despite Assad losing one-fifth of his air force, the civil war in Syria still rages unabated and North Korea still threatens a pre-emptive nuclear attack on America -- if it can get its missiles to work.

The transformation of the old global order has clearly begun, yet in the midst of momentous developments, the New York Times has managed to entirely ignore the sea-change. The NYT warns anachronistically that London has given up its position as "capital of the world" through Brexit:

London may be the capital of the world. You can argue for New York, but London has a case. Modern London is the metropolis that globalization created. Walk the streets of Holborn, ride an escalator down to the Tube and listen to the languages in the air. Italian mingles with Hindi, or Mandarin, or Spanish, or Portuguese. Walk through the City, the financial district, and listen to the plumbing system of international capitalism. London is banker to the planet.

They have not yet noticed the universe, whose center London once occupied, has been moving away from Europe for decades. For a while it was thought to have taken up residence in California. Yet even that may prove a sometime place. Proposals by the Golden State to secede from Trumpian Washington have unearthed a desire to split up the state even further: